2019
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of seasonal environmental factors in the foraging habitat selection of Alpine Ring Ouzels Turdus torquatus alpestris

Abstract: Species inhabiting mountain ecosystems are expected to be particularly vulnerable to environmental change, yet information on their basic ecology is often lacking. Knowledge from field‐based empirical studies remains essential to refine our understanding of the impact of current habitat alterations and for the consequential development of meaningful conservation management strategies. This study focuses on a poorly investigated and vulnerable mountain bird species in Europe, the Ring Ouzel Turdus torquatus. Ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, at higher elevations, dotterel frequently occupy J. trifidus heaths, which may be less affected by nitrogen deposition (Fremstad, Paal, & Möls, 2005), while wind ablation and limited availability of other minerals also have the potential to buffer against vegetation change and maintain low vegetation swards at high elevations (Britton, Beale, Towers, & Hewison, 2009; Ross, Woodin, Hester, Thompson, & Birks, 2012). We tentatively suggest, therefore, as a prompt for future research, that nitrogen deposition‐driven changes in both vegetation composition and sward height may render low‐elevation areas in particular less suitable not just for dotterel but the wider suite of alpine birds that demonstrate strong habitat preferences for low‐growing alpine vegetation types (Barras et al, 2019; Brambilla et al, 2017; Resano‐Mayor et al, 2019; Revermann, Schmid, Zbinden, Spaar, & Schröder, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, at higher elevations, dotterel frequently occupy J. trifidus heaths, which may be less affected by nitrogen deposition (Fremstad, Paal, & Möls, 2005), while wind ablation and limited availability of other minerals also have the potential to buffer against vegetation change and maintain low vegetation swards at high elevations (Britton, Beale, Towers, & Hewison, 2009; Ross, Woodin, Hester, Thompson, & Birks, 2012). We tentatively suggest, therefore, as a prompt for future research, that nitrogen deposition‐driven changes in both vegetation composition and sward height may render low‐elevation areas in particular less suitable not just for dotterel but the wider suite of alpine birds that demonstrate strong habitat preferences for low‐growing alpine vegetation types (Barras et al, 2019; Brambilla et al, 2017; Resano‐Mayor et al, 2019; Revermann, Schmid, Zbinden, Spaar, & Schröder, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the UK, one of the underlying mechanisms is believed to be warmer summers that reduce prey availability after the breeding season (Beale et al 2006). In effect, ring ouzels rely on specific habitat characteristics for efficient foraging that are highly seasonal and temporally limited, showing a preference for relatively high soil moisture and a short grass sward interspersed with bare and litter‐covered ground (Sim et al 2013, Barras et al 2020). The earlier onset of vegetation growth and reduction in soil moisture induced by warmer ambient temperatures, as well as more frequent droughts, may indeed drastically reduce the availability of belowground invertebrates (Peach et al 2004, Pearce‐Higgins 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…atmospheric) nitrogen inputs, favouring fast-growing nutrienttolerant plant species (Andrey et al, 2014;Britschgi et al, 2006;Tasser & Tappeiner, 2002). Since ring ouzel relies on patches of short and sparse ground vegetation to forage (Barras et al, 2020;Burfield, 2002), high-productivity grasslands are usually avoided (Buchanan et al, 2003;von dem Bussche et al, 2008). Therefore, it is unknown to which extent these other, parallel changes in land use could also contribute to species' fall, and by extension to the decline of other sympatric mountain species (Knaus et al, 2018;Lehikoinen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%