1995
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(95)80004-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of reporting conventions for the theory of corporate taxation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Twobook" countries (such as Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and the Netherlands) keep the books largely separate. Kanniainen and Sodersten (1995) show that uniform reporting in combination with the legal requirement to pay dividends out of after-tax book income implies that dividends cannot exceed after-tax taxable profits. On the other hand, under separate reporting [studied by, for example, Sinn (1987)], dividends may not exceed after-tax economic profits reduced by the tax savings resulting from accelerated depreciation.…”
Section: Copyright Mohr Siebeckmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…"Twobook" countries (such as Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and the Netherlands) keep the books largely separate. Kanniainen and Sodersten (1995) show that uniform reporting in combination with the legal requirement to pay dividends out of after-tax book income implies that dividends cannot exceed after-tax taxable profits. On the other hand, under separate reporting [studied by, for example, Sinn (1987)], dividends may not exceed after-tax economic profits reduced by the tax savings resulting from accelerated depreciation.…”
Section: Copyright Mohr Siebeckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, we explicitly explore the implications of a tax system that implies a tax advantage for debt, which dates back to Miller (1977). Kanniainen and Sodersten (1995) impose a legal requirement to pay dividends from after-tax book income. King (1974) was one of the first to introduce a dividend constraint on firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, as argued by Kanniainen and Södersten (1995), resources constrained in provisions for deferred taxes represent an interest-free loan from the government: hence, …rms …nancing investment by debt can exploit this interest-free borrowing opportunity, as measured by the second term on the right-hand side of equation (23). As for the case of new equity …nance, it is straightforward to show that a change in the capital allowance has a much smaller e¤ect on the debt component of the user cost of capital than that predicted under the standard theory since…”
Section: Constrained Emtrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by Kanniainen and Södersten (1995), the positive (negative) temporary di¤erence between the capital allowance and the rate of depreciation represents a deferred tax liability (asset) which must be retained by the …rm rather than be distributed to shareholders. In principle, the constrained liquidity should be used to carry out new investment.…”
Section: Constrained Emtrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation