The importance of population differences: Influence of individual characteristics on the Australian public’s preferences for emergency care

Abstract

A better understanding of the public's preferences and what factors influence them is required if they are to be used to drive decision-making in health. This is particularly the case for service areas undergoing continual reform such as emergency and primary care. Accordingly, this study sought to determine if attitudes, socio-demographic characteristics and healthcare experiences influence the public's intentions to access care and their preferences for hypothetical emergency care alternatives. A discrete choice experiment was used to elicit the preferences of Australian adults (n=1529). Mixed logit regression analyses revealed the influence of a range of individual characteristics on preferences and service uptake choices across three different presenting scenarios. Age was associated with service uptake choices in all contexts, whilst the impact of other sociodemographics, health experience and attitudinal factors varied by context. The improvements in explanatory power observed from including these factors in the models highlight the need to further clarify their influence with larger populations and other presenting contexts, and to identify other determinants of preference heterogeneity. The results suggest social marketing programs undertaken as part of demand management efforts need to be better targeted if decision-makers are seeking to increase community acceptance of emerging service models and alternatives. Other implications for health policy, service planning and research, including for workforce planning and the possible introduction of a system of co-payments are discussed.

Patients' choice and preference for common disease diagnosis and diabetes care: A discrete choice experiment

“…Considering the heterogeneous responses to the incentives, creating and implementing differentiated policies that target different patient groups may work better. Again, the difference in preferences in the common illness and diabetes care conditions supports the idea that the demand for care is pivotal in this decision‐making process . Future policies should include varied strategies based on patients' different medical demands.…”

“She’ll be right, mate!”: do Australians take their health for granted?

“…Apart from being a strategic imperative as part of efforts to reduce avoidable hospitalisations and improve population health outcomes, the current study demonstrates that health consciousness influences decisions to access care and be influenced by previous experiences of health care. 14 Health consciousness is a distinct health attitudinal measure and the merit of including it in health research alongside other measures of individual characteristics of care has been established. 14 Nevertheless, the health consciousness of Australians has not previously been reported.…”

“…This study was undertaken as part of a larger project to engage the public in health-care decision-making. 14,15 Ethics approval was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (MED/10/12/HREC) and the Metro South Hospital and Health Service Research Ethics Committee (HREC/12/QPAH/330).…”

Using discrete choice model to elicit preference for health-care priority setting

“…Paul Harris in his study, assessing the Australian public's preferences, found that patients' individual attributes have a great impact on prioritizing emergency patients. [ 30 ]…”