2016
DOI: 10.3390/v8110297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Physiologically Relevant Cell Lines for Studying Virus–Host Interactions

Abstract: Viruses interact intimately with the host cell at nearly every stage of replication, and the cell model that is chosen to study virus infection is critically important. Although primary cells reflect the phenotype of healthy cells in vivo better than cell lines, their limited lifespan makes experimental manipulation challenging. However, many tumor-derived and artificially immortalized cell lines have defects in induction of interferon-stimulated genes and other antiviral defenses. These defects can affect vir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lipase 1-mediated phenotype was observed only in primary fibroblast cells, and it is possible that the lipids modified by lipase 1 are not present or are differentially regulated in immortalized cells. Indeed, immortalized cells have been reported to have numerous attenuations affecting innate intracellular immunity (42) and the lipid composition of membranes (43). This is consistent with the differences in proviral activity between lipase 1 and lipase 2, which have been shown to have different substrate preferences (5,18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The lipase 1-mediated phenotype was observed only in primary fibroblast cells, and it is possible that the lipids modified by lipase 1 are not present or are differentially regulated in immortalized cells. Indeed, immortalized cells have been reported to have numerous attenuations affecting innate intracellular immunity (42) and the lipid composition of membranes (43). This is consistent with the differences in proviral activity between lipase 1 and lipase 2, which have been shown to have different substrate preferences (5,18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Taken together, these data confirmed the induction of a strong antiviral IFN response in multiple HIE lines at the transcriptional and protein level upon VA1 infection. Caco-2 cells, on the other hand, exhibited dysregulated IFN signaling responses, a finding common to many transformed cell lines [35]. Regardless of the strength of the antiviral IFN response, VA-1 replicated robustly in either culture system.…”
Section: Hie But Not Caco-2 Cells Mount Strong Type I and Iii Ifn Rmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, immortalization and transformation of primary cells may affect cellular antiviral signaling, possibly resulting in misrepresentation of in vivo innate immune responses. In fact, a number of cellular pathways regulating IFN-stimulated genes and antiviral defense are closely linked to cellular tumor suppression activity, including anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic, and pro-inflammatory responses (75). Accordingly, the antiviral responses observed in immortalized IEC or IPEC cells, despite being of porcine intestinal epithelial cell origin, should be further compared to those in primary IECs.…”
Section: In Vitro Models For Pedv and Pdcov Infection: Cell Lines Andmentioning
confidence: 99%