1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70032-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: A proof of principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
131
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean RMS value and SD were calculated and used to normalize activation measures during gait. 37 Time of Activation Relative to Initial Contact. We used a total of 9 ground contacts for data processing of time of activation.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean RMS value and SD were calculated and used to normalize activation measures during gait. 37 Time of Activation Relative to Initial Contact. We used a total of 9 ground contacts for data processing of time of activation.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This window of raw EMG activity was processed using the Root Mean Square (RMS) procedure. The mean of the RMS was normalised in relation to a maximal isometric contraction, performed after a warm-up consisting of 3 submaximal isometric contractions (Lehman & McGill, 1999). TA and MG maximal isometric contractions (MIC) were measured with the ankle in neutral position.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subcutaneous fat, skin impedance, electrode position etc. [31,40,61]. It has been demonstrated experimentally that the subcutaneous fat layer will affect the intensity of the EMG signals and hence absolute values of EMG should not be taken at face value [20].…”
Section: Emg Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%