2023
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of multi‐year studies and commercial yield metrics in measuring pollinator dependence ratios: A case study in UK raspberries Rubus idaeus L.

Abstract: The benefit of pollinators to crop production is normally calculated using “pollinator dependence ratios,” which reflect the proportion of yield lost (here reported as a value between 0 and 1) in the absence of pollinators; these ratios are quantified experimentally using pollinator exclusion experiments. Pollinator dependence ratio estimates can vary considerably for a single crop, creating large, frequently overlooked, uncertainty in economic valuations of pollinators. The source of this variation is usually… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although investigating these factors is beyond the aim of the study, future research should clarify when and where pollinators are limited. For example, Herbertsson et al (2021) showed in a recent meta-analysis a large variability in the effects of different pollinators on seed sets, and Ryan et al (2023) found interannual variation in fruit yields in raspberry crops, but the causes of this variability remain to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although investigating these factors is beyond the aim of the study, future research should clarify when and where pollinators are limited. For example, Herbertsson et al (2021) showed in a recent meta-analysis a large variability in the effects of different pollinators on seed sets, and Ryan et al (2023) found interannual variation in fruit yields in raspberry crops, but the causes of this variability remain to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%