The importance of long‐term experiments in agriculture: their management to ensure continued crop production and soil fertility; the Rothamsted experience

Abstract

SummaryLong‐term field experiments that test a range of treatments and are intended to assess the sustainability of crop production, and thus food security, must be managed actively to identify any treatment that is failing to maintain or increase yields. Once identified, carefully considered changes can be made to the treatment or management, and if they are successful yields will change. If suitable changes cannot be made to an experiment to ensure its continued relevance to sustainable crop production, then it should be stopped. Long‐term experiments have many other uses. They provide a field resource and samples for research on plant and soil processes and properties, especially those properties where change occurs slowly and affects soil fertility. Archived samples of all inputs and outputs are an invaluable source of material for future research, and data from current and archived samples can be used to develop models to describe soil and plant processes. Such changes and uses in the Rothamsted experiments are described, and demonstrate that with the appropriate crop, soil and management, acceptable yields can be maintained for many years, with either organic manure or inorganic fertilizers.Highlights Long‐term experiments demonstrate sustainability and increases in crop yield when managed to optimize soil fertility.Shifting individual response curves into coincidence increases understanding of the factors involved.Changes in inorganic and organic pollutants in archived crop and soil samples are related to inputs over time.Models describing soil processes are developed from current and archived soil data.

Diversifying cropping systems enhances productivity, stability, and nitrogen use efficiency

“…Development and adoption of productive, efficient, sustainable, and profitable cropping systems require a thorough evaluation of several years of experimentation. Long‐term cropping experiments are ideally suited in such cases, and can aid in making science‐based decisions for developing best management practices (Johnston & Poulton, ).…”

Social–ecological experiments to foster agroecological transition

“…Many experiments have been conducted in enclosures, such as greenhouses or experimental fields, to control the environment and exclude exogenous sources of variation, in particular human variation in farming practices. This is also the case for long‐term field experiments such as the Broadbalk or Park Grass experiments in Rothamsted, UK (Johnston & Poulton, ), or Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) in Müncheberg, Germany (Dalchow, Bork, & Schubert, ). Other field experiments have been set up for testing whole cropping systems (Debaeke et al, ; Hossard et al, ), but have necessarily been limited to comparisons of complete cropping systems rather than controlling the variation of each individual factor.…”

The ‘Palo a Pique’ Long-Term Research Platform: First 25 Years of a Crop–Livestock Experiment in Uruguay

“…Key performance indicators provide a practical assessment of the sustainability of an animal production system, and for those KPI levels to be maintained or increased over time there must be a match between the livestock strategy, pastures, climate and system management. Assuming the first three conditions are met, management becomes important [51]. We expect that the four systems will tend to be stabilized in terms of the short-term decisions after two production cycles.…”