2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Individualized Vancomycin Dosing to Ensure Optimal Exposure Early in Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This likely explains the large proportion of isolates with a vancomycin MIC of 2 mg/L in this study; this limited our ability to fully control for phenotype. Finally, because only a small proportion of the patients were monitored by vancomycin AUC, we were unable to control for vancomycin exposure [36]. Given the fact that AUC-guided dosing was more common in the vancomycin + cefepime group and is associated with reduced vancomycin dose and exposure, it is implausible that AUC-guided dosing would explain the improved BSI clearance observed in the combination patients [28, 37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This likely explains the large proportion of isolates with a vancomycin MIC of 2 mg/L in this study; this limited our ability to fully control for phenotype. Finally, because only a small proportion of the patients were monitored by vancomycin AUC, we were unable to control for vancomycin exposure [36]. Given the fact that AUC-guided dosing was more common in the vancomycin + cefepime group and is associated with reduced vancomycin dose and exposure, it is implausible that AUC-guided dosing would explain the improved BSI clearance observed in the combination patients [28, 37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fraction of patients with AUC 24 between 400 and 600 (mg.h)/L is calculated for each day as 1 minus the fraction of patients where the AUC 24 is below 400 (mg.h)/L minus the fraction of patients where the AUC 24 is above 600 (mg.h)/L. This target exposure window is a frequently reported target in the literature for the optimization of vancomycin therapy assuming a minimum inhibitory concentration ≤ 1 mg/L 11,12 . To avoid the optimization being driven by the most populated subgroup in the virtual patient population, we split up the calculation of the fitness criterion according to body mass index (< 18.5, < 30, or > 30 kg/m 2 ), age (< 50, < 75, or > 75 years), and eCL CR according to Cockcroft‐Gault 13 (< 50, < 120, or > 120 mL/min).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IoT-type devices that comprise thin sensors are the next step in point of care testing (POCT) and personalised medicine [ 37 ] for tailored diagnostics and therapy that addresses each patient’s needs based on their specific background, disease prognosis, and assessed risks [ 38 ]. Despite complex and multifactorial difficulties [ 39 ], considerable progress has been made: the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has approved drugs labelled on specific genomics biomarkers [ 40 ], tests for the long-term genetic-based management of breast cancer [ 41 ], emerging titration schemes tested for specific medication [ 42 ], and dispensing devices designed for diabetic or Parkinson’s Disease patient support [ 43 ]. Nowadays, e-skin sensors are designed and developed to measure and display physiological variables such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, glucose, or moisture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%