2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-020-00127-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Forest Extractive Resources for Income Generation and Subsistence among Caboclos and Colonists in the Brazilian Amazon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This presents a conundrum for development planners who wish to base income enhancement policies on NTFPs. Specifically, our results suggest that infrastructure (e.g., roads) by improving accessibility may very well incentivize traditional extractivists and smallholder farmers to abandon NTFPs for agricultural specialization and livestock [42][43][44]. This is potentially problematic for bioeconomy advocates since the Amazonian Nations are two decades into IIRSA's massive effort to integrate roads, rail, rivers into a multimodal transportation network connected to global markets [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This presents a conundrum for development planners who wish to base income enhancement policies on NTFPs. Specifically, our results suggest that infrastructure (e.g., roads) by improving accessibility may very well incentivize traditional extractivists and smallholder farmers to abandon NTFPs for agricultural specialization and livestock [42][43][44]. This is potentially problematic for bioeconomy advocates since the Amazonian Nations are two decades into IIRSA's massive effort to integrate roads, rail, rivers into a multimodal transportation network connected to global markets [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The concern remains that the most valuable resources, such as rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) and Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) are no longer relevant to the regional economy, and the opportunity costs presented by cattle ranching and wage labor is too great of an enticement for peasant farmers [38][39][40][41]. Possibly of greatest concern today is that both traditional extractivists and recent settlers perceive low value of NTFPs to their livelihoods, especially in comparison to specialized agriculture and livestock [42][43][44].…”
Section: Ntfps and Ccps For Improving Rural Livelihoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When traditional communities lose their traditional livelihood options, they prioritize economic benefits as a subsistence condition (Ribeiro et al, 2020). These new relationships with the forest impact natural and environmental resources, generating significant deforestation annually (Camilotti et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of Pará (Eastern Amazon) suffers with the highest deforestation rate in the Brazilian Amazon (Brasil, INPE 2019 ), being infrastructure, power, mining, pasture, and agriculture among its main drivers. Historically, the state’s economy has been considered to be based on the extraction of natural goods (extractivism activities, i.e., timber, minerals, seeds, and fruits) (Camilotti et al 2020 , Iorio & Monni 2020 ) and, although expanding, crop production is considered a marginal aspect of the local economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%