The importance of examining variants of implementation among evidence-based and promising programs to prevent child maltreatment

Lutzker, John R.; Casillas, Katherine L.

doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.01.005

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Effective implementation of interventions to reduce child maltreatment and neglect requires balancing fidelity to the intervention as designed by researchers with adaptation by the providers delivering the intervention (Aarons et al , 2017; Lau et al , 2017; Lutzker and Casillas, 2016; Paulsell et al , 2014). Adaptation is often needed to successfully translate new interventions into non-research settings and ensure the practice fits the organization, client population and the local context (Brownson et al , 2017; Damschroder et al , 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Let’s talk about adaptation! How individuals discuss adaptation during evidence-based practice implementation

Lengnick‐Hall

Fenwick

Hurlburt

et al. 2019

JCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Researchers suggest that adaptation should be a planned process, with practitioners actively consulting with program developers or academic partners, but few studies have examined how adaptation unfolds during evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. The purpose of this paper is to describe real-world adaptation discussions and the conditions under which they occurred during the implementation of a new practice across multiple county child welfare systems. Design/methodology/approach This study qualitatively examines 127 meeting notes to understand how implementers and researchers talk about adaptation during the implementation of SafeCare, an EBP aimed at reducing child maltreatment and neglect. Findings Several types of adaptation discussions emerged. First, because it appeared difficult to get staff to talk about adaptation in group settings, meeting participants discussed factors that hindered adaptation conversations. Next, they discussed types of adaptations that they made or would like to make. Finally, they discussed adaptation as a normal part of SafeCare implementation. Research limitations/implications Limitations include data collection by a single research team member and focus on a particular EBP. However, this study provides new insight into how stakeholders naturally discuss adaptation needs, ideas and concerns. Practical implications Understanding adaptation discussions can help managers engage frontline staff who are using newly implemented EBPs, identify adaptation needs and solutions, and proactively support individuals who are balancing adaptation and fidelity during implementation. Originality/value This study’s unique data captured in vivo interactions that occurred at various time points during the implementation of an EBP rather than drawing upon data collected from more scripted and cross-sectional formats. Multiple child welfare and implementation stakeholders and types of interactions were examined.

show abstract