The importance of documentation, design and reuse in risk management for SPL

Lobato, Luanna Lopes; O’Leary, Pádraig; Almeida, Eduardo Santana de; Meira, Sílvio Romero de Lemos

doi:10.1145/1878450.1878475

Cited by 4 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this section, we present the results identified through the evidence analysis from two scoping studies to RM in the SPL [1] and SSD [4].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We looked to for the publication channels used to collect the primary studies in both scoping studies. This comparison is justified since we would like to know the sources in which the risks were found [1].…”

Section: ) Publication Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

“…It can be justified by the fact that RM is an activity that is not as explored to SPL as other development activities. Thus, this issue turns out to be very specific [1].…”

Section: ) Publication Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in the context of Software Product Lines (SPL) engineering the use of RM is not explored in the same proportions, lacking of studies that address issues related to empirical evaluations on RM in SPL [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A study on risk management for software engineering

Lobato¹,

Neto²,

Machado³

2012

16th International Conference on Evaluation &Amp; Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Explicit Risk Management (RM) in Software Product Lines Engineering (SPL) is considered an open question, as posed in literature, and confirmed by industrial practices, unlike Single System Development (SSD), which contains a large set of evidence. The goal of this research is to synthesize the available evidence gathered in previous research, in a form of two scoping studies, which considered RM in SPL and SSD, using the narrative synthesis method. Through the synthesis we could identify common risks to both development paradigm, as well as RM activities and practices most commonly used to apply RM in projects. In addition, was observed that RM to SPL is still an open question if compared to SSD. Software Product Lines; Single System Development; Risk Management; Narrative Synthesis.

show abstract

“…In this section, we present the results identified through the evidence analysis from two scoping studies to RM in the SPL [1] and SSD [4].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Publication Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

“…It can be justified by the fact that RM is an activity that is not as explored to SPL as other development activities. Thus, this issue turns out to be very specific [1].…”

Section: ) Publication Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A study on risk management for software engineering

Lobato¹,

Neto²,

Machado³

2012

16th International Conference on Evaluation &Amp; Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The SPL approach is emerging as a viable and important development paradigm allowing companies to achieve large-scale reuse, reduced time-tomarket, improved quality and reduced costs. Benefits have been reported as a result of adopting SPL through its systematic exploration of reuse opportunities [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk management in software product lines: An industrial case study

Lobato¹,

Neto²,

Machado³

et al. 2012

2012 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software Product Lines (SPL) adoption can affect several aspects of an organization and it involves significant investment and risk. This way, SPL risk management is a crucial activity of SPL adoption. This study aims to identify SPL risks during the scoping and requirement disciplines to provide information to better understand risk management in SPL. In order to achieve the previous stated goal, a case study research was applied in an industrial project in the medical information management domain. Using the captured risks, a classification scheme was built and risk mitigation strategies were identified. We spent five months, totaling 79 hours, performing risk management (RM) in the scoping discipline and twelve months, totaling 148 hours, performing RM on the requirements discipline. We identified 32 risks during the scoping discipline and 20 risks during the requirements discipline, 14 risks occurred in both disciplines. Some identified risks are not particular to SPL development, however, they have their impact increased due to the SPL characteristic. All the study results and lessons learned are useful for all project managers and researchers who are considering the introduction of SPL risk management in industry or academia.

show abstract

Quality by Design for industry translation: Three‐dimensional risk assessment failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis for additively manufactured patient‐specific implants

Martinez-Marquez

Terhaer

Scheinemann

et al. 2020

Engineering Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The complexity of patient-specific implants combined with the current limited expertise in reliability engineering and manufacturability in the additive manufacturing (AM) sector is posing a number of quality performance challenges.Worldwide medical device regulatory bodies are facing increasing pressure to devise adequate standards to ensure long-term patient safety and product performance. The implementation of the Quality by Design (QbD) system to titanium 3D-printed bone implants offers a proven system to ensure that products are designed and manufactured correctly from the beginning without errors. This article reports on the development of a failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) coupled with a 3D risk assessment approach. This integrated approach is based on a questionnaire performed with three industry firms and three university research groups with significant experience and expertise in medical device product development and/or research in this field. Research outcomes include a FMECA form containing 137 failure modes with AM materials, AM machine general, fabrication, electron beam melting machine, finishing, and design being as the most sensitive process areas in terms of product quality. We subsequently propose corresponding preventive and corrective strategies for risk mitigation. The approach forms part of the QbD system being developed by the authors specifically for additive manufactured titanium patient-specific implants. K E Y W O R D Sadditive manufacturing, criticality analysis, failure mode effects, patient-specific implants, quality by designThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

show abstract

The importance of documentation, design and reuse in risk management for SPL

Cited by 4 publications

References 29 publications

A study on risk management for software engineering

A study on risk management for software engineering

Risk management in software product lines: An industrial case study

Quality by Design for industry translation: Three‐dimensional risk assessment failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis for additively manufactured patient‐specific implants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About