2013
DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-4547-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of different spatial scales in determining structural and functional characteristics of deep-sea infauna communities

Abstract: The urge to understand spatial distributions of species and communities and their causative processes has continuously instigated the development and testing of conceptual models in spatial ecology. For the deep sea, there is evidence that structural and functional characteristics of benthic communities are regulated by a multitude of biotic and environmental processes that act in concert on different spatial scales, but the spatial patterns are poorly understood compared to those for terrestrial ecosystems. D… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(98 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meiofauna community composition (multivariate, square root transformed, Bray-Curtis Similarity) and total meiofauna abundance (univariate, square root transformed, Euclidean Distance) were analyzed with PERMANOVA tests (three-factor design: water depth, sediment depth, core). The random factor 'core 'was inserted as nested in water depth to account for the dependency of the sediment layers within each core; this approach has been used in several studies as a good solution to the sediment layer dependence issue (e.g., Ingels and Vanreusel, 2013;Rosli et al, 2016). This design allows us to investigate differences between water depths and sediment layers simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meiofauna community composition (multivariate, square root transformed, Bray-Curtis Similarity) and total meiofauna abundance (univariate, square root transformed, Euclidean Distance) were analyzed with PERMANOVA tests (three-factor design: water depth, sediment depth, core). The random factor 'core 'was inserted as nested in water depth to account for the dependency of the sediment layers within each core; this approach has been used in several studies as a good solution to the sediment layer dependence issue (e.g., Ingels and Vanreusel, 2013;Rosli et al, 2016). This design allows us to investigate differences between water depths and sediment layers simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of food quantity and availability on nematode abundance and diversity in OMZs has also been suggested by Cook et al (2000) for the Arabian Sea. Food availability is a regulating factor along the vertical sediment profile (Ingels et al, 2009(Ingels et al, , 2011Ingels and Vanreusel, 2013). At the Costa Rica margin, meiofauna densities declined with increasing depth in the sediment, a recurrent gradient observed in marine sediments (Levin et al, 2002;Soltwedel et al, 2005).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Meiofauna Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of bathymetric pattern has been observed in several canyons, independent of geographical region or canyon-scale environmental conditions (Bianchelli et al, 2010;Ingels et al, 2013a;Romano et al, 2013;Leduc et al, 2014;Pusceddu et al, 2013) and is likely reminiscent of canyon heterogeneity and associated environmental variability exerting influence on benthic assemblages. More important are small-scale environmental conditions that act on the scale of meiofauna and nematodes, such as those associated with sediment grain size and sediment depth, or the amount and availability of food (Ingels et al, 2013b, Leduc et al, 2012, 2014b. Ingels et al (2011) water depths (Danovaro et al, 2009, Ingels et al, 2011, Gambi and Danovaro, 2016.…”
Section: Faunal Assemblages A) Foraminiferamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure might lead to possibly biased results, as different proportions of the nematode communities could be extracted from different samples. Nevertheless, we adopted this procedure as it is the standard methodology used in practically all nematode studies in the deep sea (Danovaro et al, 2008a, b;Leduc et al, 2012;Ingels and Vanreusel, 2013), thus allowing the comparison of our data with previous studies.…”
Section: Nematode Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%