2007
DOI: 10.1002/nav.20228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain

Abstract: This paper focuses on the importance of decoupling recurrent supply risk and disruption risk when planning appropriate mitigation strategies. We show that bundling the two uncertainties leads a manager to underutilize a reliable source while over utilizing a cheaper but less reliable supplier. As in Dada et al. (working paper, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, 2003), we show that increasing quantity from a cheaper but less reliable source is an effective risk mitigation strategy if most of the supply risk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
113
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
3
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…inventory (e.g., Tomlin (2006) and Schmitt et al (2009)), emergency sourcing (e.g., Chopra et al (2007) and Yang et al (2009)), dual sourcing (e.g., Parlar and Perry (1996), Dada et al (2007) and Babich et al (2007)), demand management (Tomlin, 2009), and process improvement (Wang et al (2010) and Bakshi and Kleindorfer (2009)). Financial mechanisms for managing supply risk, e.g., supplier subsidies to reduce the likelihood of bankruptcy-induced disruptions, have been considered by Swinney andNetessine (2009) andBabich (2010).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…inventory (e.g., Tomlin (2006) and Schmitt et al (2009)), emergency sourcing (e.g., Chopra et al (2007) and Yang et al (2009)), dual sourcing (e.g., Parlar and Perry (1996), Dada et al (2007) and Babich et al (2007)), demand management (Tomlin, 2009), and process improvement (Wang et al (2010) and Bakshi and Kleindorfer (2009)). Financial mechanisms for managing supply risk, e.g., supplier subsidies to reduce the likelihood of bankruptcy-induced disruptions, have been considered by Swinney andNetessine (2009) andBabich (2010).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmitt, Snyder and Shen (2007) prove several properties of this system and provide an approximation for such systems with stochastic demand. Chopra, Reinhardt and Mohan (2007) consider a newsvendor facing both supply disruptions and yield uncertainty in a single-period setting. They examine the error inherent in "bundling" the two sources of supply risk; i.e., acting as though the disruptions are simply a manifestation of yield uncertainty.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, supply uncertainty is a major issue in both the industrial and academic worlds. Most of the papers considering supply uncertainty focus on the production planning problems of uncertain production capacity, random manufacturing yield, or unreliable supplier (Gerchak et al, 1988;Parlar and Perry, 1996;Zimmer, 2002;Gupta and Cooper, 2005;Chopra et al, 2007;Serel, 2008;He and Zhang, 2008;Keren, 2009;Pac et al, 2009;Xu, 2010;He and Zhang, 2010;Li et al, 2010;Giri, 2011;He and Zhao, 2012;Li et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2012aTang et al, , 2012bXanthopoulos et al, 2012;Li et al, 2013). Giri (2011) focused on an inventory model for a single type of products and a single period in which the retailer could source from two suppliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%