2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2014.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of conspecific facilitation during recruitment and regeneration: A case study in degraded mangroves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
22
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes resulted in the forest dieback and subsequent recolonization of the impacted area, mainly by A. germinans . Pore water salinity accumulated to extremely high levels (100 ppt at 50-cm depth), and the air surface temperature frequently exceeds 40 °C (Vogt et al, 2014). These environmental features contributed to the dwarfism of recolonizing individuals (Cohen & Lara, 2003; Pranchai et al, 2017), whose shrub architecture (up to 2.0 m in height) contrasts to the former tall morphology (up to 30 m in height), still observed on surrounding areas, where the hydrology remained unaltered (Menezes, Berger, & Mehlig, 2008) (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes resulted in the forest dieback and subsequent recolonization of the impacted area, mainly by A. germinans . Pore water salinity accumulated to extremely high levels (100 ppt at 50-cm depth), and the air surface temperature frequently exceeds 40 °C (Vogt et al, 2014). These environmental features contributed to the dwarfism of recolonizing individuals (Cohen & Lara, 2003; Pranchai et al, 2017), whose shrub architecture (up to 2.0 m in height) contrasts to the former tall morphology (up to 30 m in height), still observed on surrounding areas, where the hydrology remained unaltered (Menezes, Berger, & Mehlig, 2008) (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional annotation and subsequent assignment of most putative protein-coding transcripts to GO terms (76.24%; Figure S4) enabled the assessment of DETs that highlighted key aspects of a differential response of A. germinans to contrasting source environments, differing markedly in hydrological regime, soil pore water salinity, solar radiation and surface temperature (Lara & Cohen, 2006;Pranchai et al, 2017;Vogt et al, 2014). We focused this analysis on enriched biological processes previously identified to be involved in the tolerance, resistance or response to osmotic and drought stress in various crops, model and nonmodel species, including mangroves ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Differential Transcript Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changed hydrology resulted in forest dieback and subsequent recolonization of the degraded area, mainly by A. germinans. Pore water salinity accumulated to extremely high levels (100 ppt at 50 cm depth), and the air surface temperature frequently exceeded 40°C (Vogt et al, 2014). These environmental features contributed to the dwarfism of recolonizing individuals (Cohen & Lara, 2003;Pranchai et al, 2017), whose shrub architecture (up to 2.0 m in height) contrasts the former tall morphology (up to 30 m in height), which is still observed in surrounding areas where the hydrology remained unaltered (Menezes, Berger, & Mehlig, 2008; Figure 2b).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best known inhibitory effects occur through niche preemption, when early founders monopolize important resources that would otherwise be available to other species (De Meester et al, 2016;Fukami, 2015;Sutherland, 1978), or when first colonizers act as ecosystem engineers, modifying their habitat and preventing the establishment of other organisms (Bonnici, Evans, Borg, & Schembri, 2012;Jones, Lawton, & Shachak, 1994). Depending on intrinsic species traits, however, ecosystem engineering may otherwise play an opposite role and facilitate species arriving later (Fukami, 2015;Jones et al, 1994), for example, by providing tridimensional substrates and therefore increasing settlement grounds (Russ, 1980), or through the mitigation of abiotic stress by supplying more benign microhabitats (Jurgens & Gaylord, 2016;Perea & Gil, 2014;Vogt et al, 2014), ultimately leading to species coexistence and an increase of biodiversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attraction through chemical cues may constitute an efficient way to promote aggregation in suitable habitats (Pawlik, 1992;Robinson, Larsen, & Kerr, 2011;Silva-Filho, Bailez, & Viana-Bailez, 2012), indirectly increasing the strength of densitydependent regulation mechanisms of founder populations. Positive density-dependent interactions include the mitigation of abiotic stress in crowding intertidal invertebrates (Jurgens & Gaylord, 2016;Minchinton, 1997), caterpillars (Klok & Chown, 1999), and plants (Vogt et al, 2014); enhanced reproduction, such as fruit dispersal in plants (Blendinger, Loiselle, & Blake, 2008) and fertilization in marine invertebrates (Kent, Hawkins, & Doncaster, 2003;Levitan, Sewell, & Chia, 1992) and terrestrial woodlice (Broly, Deneubourg, & Devigne, 2013); and diminishing of predation risk in invertebrates (Denno & Benrey, 1997;Turchin & Kareiva, 1989) and vertebrates (Blumstein & Daniel, 2003;Carrascal, Alonso, & Alonso, 1990). Negative interactions usually lie in some sort of intraspecific competition, which may reach unsustainable levels under conditions of very high-population density (Branch, 1975;Chisholm & Muller-Landau, 2011;Gerla & Mooij, 2014;Hart & Marshall, 2009;Robins & Reid, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%