How do moral concerns affect fraud and detection, for example, tax compliance and the need for audits?We propose answers by exploring a psychological 2 × 1 × 2 × 1 inspection game which incorporates belief-dependent guilt, unawareness, and third-party audience effects. Novel conclusions are drawn regarding whose behavior is affected by moral concerns (it's the inspector's more than the inspectee's) as well as the policy issue whether to allow the use of a principle of public access whereby tax returns are made public information.
| INTRODUCTIONA clear conscience may be a good pillow (as the proverb goes). Yet, this may not be enough to deter criminal behavior. Shoplifting, fare dodging, use of narcotics, reneged arms control treaties, embezzlement, corruption, moral hazard in insurance, and tax evasion happens. Law enforcement (or contracting partners) react by engaging in costly audits, inspections, raids, and crackdowns. The interaction is studied in the literature on inspection games. 1 Mostly, no notion of integrity, virtue, or morale is invoked though. It is natural to wonder whether conclusions