2018
DOI: 10.46867/ijcp.2018.31.01.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Comparative Psychology in Equine-Assisted Activities and Therapies

Abstract: Practitioners of Equine Assisted Activities and Therapies (EAAT) use it to help individuals suffering from a wide range of physical and psychological disorders as an alternative practice in physical and psychotherapy. Although there is plenty of research to support the benefits of these therapies, there is little research in equine behavior in this context, specifically how equine behaviors can best be utilized to improve the health of the human component. Although much of EAAT uses horses in physical therap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the intervention the patients got to know the horses they had chosen as their therapy horses. A bonding and trust between the participant and the horse in therapy ( 65 , 66 ) and “ I miss Allu (name of the horse)” was recognized through the participant interveiw. Vice versa, as the horses became accustomed to the work, trusted the therapy assistant and the therapist, working was made predictable and safe, building a collective trust within the session ( 67 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the intervention the patients got to know the horses they had chosen as their therapy horses. A bonding and trust between the participant and the horse in therapy ( 65 , 66 ) and “ I miss Allu (name of the horse)” was recognized through the participant interveiw. Vice versa, as the horses became accustomed to the work, trusted the therapy assistant and the therapist, working was made predictable and safe, building a collective trust within the session ( 67 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%