2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.01489
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of black hole repositioning for galaxy formation simulations

Yannick M. Bahé,
Joop Schaye,
Matthieu Schaller
et al.

Abstract: Active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback from accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs) is an essential ingredient of galaxy formation simulations. The orbital evolution of SMBHs is affected by dynamical friction that cannot be predicted self-consistently by contemporary simulations of galaxy formation in representative volumes. Instead, such simulations typically use a simple "repositioning" of SMBHs, but the effects of this approach on SMBH and galaxy properties have not yet been investigated systematically. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…trees) within Nbody codes are only set up to include gas particles for optimisation reasons. Our results, along with those in Bahé et al (2021), suggest that the black hole occupation fraction of cluster galaxies is severely underestimated within cosmological simulations that employ such repositioning schemes. These results also provide an explanation for the merger-dominated growth of massive supermassive black holes at low redshift.…”
Section: Bcg Black Holesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…trees) within Nbody codes are only set up to include gas particles for optimisation reasons. Our results, along with those in Bahé et al (2021), suggest that the black hole occupation fraction of cluster galaxies is severely underestimated within cosmological simulations that employ such repositioning schemes. These results also provide an explanation for the merger-dominated growth of massive supermassive black holes at low redshift.…”
Section: Bcg Black Holesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Recent works, such as Bahé et al (2021), have noted that there appears to be a lower than expected black hole occupation fraction for cluster galaxies (see their Appendix A). Notably, the model discussed in Bahé et al (2021) also repositions only on gas particles, as typically the neighbour-finding structures (e.g. trees) within Nbody codes are only set up to include gas particles for optimisation reasons.…”
Section: Bcg Black Holementioning
confidence: 96%
“…An important concern emerging at this point relates the exact particulars of the BH treatment, which has been shown to have relevant consequences not only on BH properties themselves, but also on other components of the cosmological simulation. For instance, Bahé et al (2021) study the influence of BH repositioning on baryonic components of galaxies. A different work by Ragone-Figueroa et al (2018) found that an improved 'BH pinning' can result in smaller BCG masses, eventually leading to better agreement with observations.…”
Section: Stellar Mass In Bcgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF18 pointed out that particular care must be taken in controlling the centring of super-massive black hole (SMBH) particles, which leave their host galaxies in the course of the simulations due to frequent dynamical disturbances and mergers, whose effects are probably amplified by numerical limitations. Under these circumstances, the SMBH energy feedback does not effectively suppress gas over-cooling (Borgani et al 2006;Wurster & Thacker 2013) nor star formation in the centre of massive galaxies (Ludlow et al 2020;Bahé et al 2021). Thus it is worth studying the impact of feedback schemes, softening and resolution in producing the M SH − V max relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report data for 10xB20 simulations (black solid line), 1xR15 simulations subset of 10xB20 regions (solid cyan line), 1xRF18 simulations subset of 10xB20 regions (pink line) and 1xf SH (magenta line), for SHs with projected distances < 0.15R vir (right panel). We compare our high-resolution simulations with simulated data points of high-resolution Hydrangea simulations(Bahé et al 2021) (red).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%