The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1038/nchem.373
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of being bonded

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, it has been reported that a fully hydrogenated silica surface was inert with respect to the adsorption of Au atoms, even though the binding energy between Au and Si surface dangling bonds (3.8 eV) or O dangling bonds (2.7 eV) was higher than that between Au and any surface site at the TiO 2 surface37. Since the bonding nature is still confusing38, based on previous research on the adsorption of thiols on Au surfaces39, we performed DFT calculations for the interfacial binding between Sb 2 S 3 nanoparticles and the deprotonated HNTs surface. The DOS for the Sb 2 S 3 /HNTs nanocomposites surface structure remained the same as the algebraic sum of the DOS of Sb 2 S 3 and that of the HNTs surface before and after physisorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, it has been reported that a fully hydrogenated silica surface was inert with respect to the adsorption of Au atoms, even though the binding energy between Au and Si surface dangling bonds (3.8 eV) or O dangling bonds (2.7 eV) was higher than that between Au and any surface site at the TiO 2 surface37. Since the bonding nature is still confusing38, based on previous research on the adsorption of thiols on Au surfaces39, we performed DFT calculations for the interfacial binding between Sb 2 S 3 nanoparticles and the deprotonated HNTs surface. The DOS for the Sb 2 S 3 /HNTs nanocomposites surface structure remained the same as the algebraic sum of the DOS of Sb 2 S 3 and that of the HNTs surface before and after physisorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of a chemical bond varies between different models, so direct comparisons are often problematic (Rzepa 2009), e.g., between models that define bonds based on counting electron pairs or an inverse strength-distance relationship. Gibbs et al (2014), however, surveyed s ij and r b in several oxide minerals and molecular analogs, and observed the relationship shown in Equation 4, where R M-O is the metal-oxygen bond length, s M-O is the Pauling bond strength (i.e., an averaged bond valence calculated by dividing the atomic valence of the cation by its coordination number), and r is the row number of the element (taking the second row starting with Li as r = 1).…”
Section: Atoms In Molecules and The Bvmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Put simply, the main exchange mechanism, the scientific journal, is accepted [1] as seriously lagging behind in its fitness for purpose. It is in urgent need of reinvention; one experiment in such was presented as a data-rich chemical exploratorium [2]. My case here in this article will be based on my recent research experiences in two specific areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyse these features requires evaluating the wavefunction of a (small fragment) of the system. This is then inspected for not only the electronic interactions between covalent bonds themselves but also the nature of any close (non-covalent) contacts between pairs of atoms which do not classify as bonds or appear in a bond connection table (and are therefore un-indexed and hence neglected) [2]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%