2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of ADCP alignment with GPS in moving-boat streamflow measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the difference in accuracy between the multi-view and small-angle refraction correction methods was only small. This supports the findings of Woodget ADCP could be biased in cases of poorly aligned transects caused by a moving bed at fine-grained river channels (Huang, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the difference in accuracy between the multi-view and small-angle refraction correction methods was only small. This supports the findings of Woodget ADCP could be biased in cases of poorly aligned transects caused by a moving bed at fine-grained river channels (Huang, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another factor which had the potential to impact the discharge estimate was the accuracy of the extracted cross‐sections, which relied on the success of the reconstructed bathymetry. Moreover, discharge estimation with ADCP could be biased in cases of poorly aligned transects caused by a moving bed at fine‐grained river channels (Huang, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wider the river, the more uncertainty is introduced to a video recording from the riverbank due to an increasing degree of perspective distortion. Though this angle of video recording may be still suitable for estimating the average flow velocity or discharge [41,53,65,66], it does not allow to recognise small-scale flow patterns, especially in the areas that are closer to the riverbank opposite to the one where the camera is mounted. The use of cameras mounted on and under bridges limits data acquisition to areas where bridges are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the measurement procedures may present differences between ADCP companies, the moving-boat measurement results are commonly the average of elemental discharges based on a number of transects, which is crossings of the stream, under approximately steady flow conditions. Ideally, the average includes pairs of reciprocal transects to minimize directional biases in measured discharges, due to asymmetrical deployment, compass, or heading errors [9,10] . Given the use of ADCP measurements as inputs to flow monitoring and decision-making activities related to water resources [11,12] , the uncertainty has to be estimated carefully in addition to a quality assurance and quality control process [13,14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%