2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of stand composition, age and spatial patterns of forest regions with different ownership type for management optimisation in northern Latvia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). As in other regions, this parcelling resulted in a very high diversity of management approaches, management intensities, and tree species (Von Lüpke et al 2011, Schaich & Plieninger 2013, Rendenieks et al 2015, Fig. S1 and Fig.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). As in other regions, this parcelling resulted in a very high diversity of management approaches, management intensities, and tree species (Von Lüpke et al 2011, Schaich & Plieninger 2013, Rendenieks et al 2015, Fig. S1 and Fig.…”
Section: Iforest -Biogeosciences and Forestrymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This habitat pattern is in contrast to the larger forest units in the state forests, which are treated according to welldefined management plans (Mölder et al 2015). In keeping with the environmental heterogeneity hypothesis (Huston 1994), these differences between both forest ownership types can be expected to result in a higher biodiversity in the private forests than in the state-owned forests (Schaich & Plieninger 2013, Rendenieks et al 2015. Further studies are needed to confirm this assumption for the Osnabrück region.…”
Section: Implications For Nature Conservationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we focused on analysis of temporal dynamics within the landscapes in the specific time period of the study, and within spatial and policy contexts, without examination of particular species or processes, thus allowing comparisons among the studied landscapes. The defined boundaries of studied landscapes were restricted to one ownership division (limited to state forests), and spatial patterns can differ in areas dominated by private forests (Rendenieks et al 2015), but data for these were not available for the selected study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Найбільшу площу займають степи, понад 87% території області (Rehionalna dopovid…, 2015). Дослідження типологічного різноманіття (Tkach, Bondar, 2015;Bondar, 2016) та біологічного різноманіття лісових насаджень актуальне не тільки для України (Pasternak et al, 2011;Zibtsev et al, 2012), але й закордоном в Європі (Barbati et al, 2014;Kovač et al, 2016), США (Paula et al, 2017), Індії (Chandra et аl., 2010), Королівство Таїланд (Miki et al, 2017), Латвії (Rendenieks et al, 2015), Німеччини (Weber, 2017), Бразилії (Kröger, 2017) та інших державах. З метою підвищення рівня життя людей та збереження довкілля планети необхідно вести лісове господарство на засадах сталого розвитку, яке забезпечувало безперервність виконання лісами еколого-економічних функцій.…”
Section: типологічне різноманіття лісів на водозборіunclassified