1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1999.tb00187.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of research on gender differences in self‐assessment and 360 degree appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is the case then at least their efforts are being recognised through the 360-degree appraisal system in the case company (Fletcher, 1999). An alternative explanation is provided by the 'gender contrast' effect (Heilman et al, 1988) where the over-rating of females performing roles perceived as male-oriented, such as management, is evidenced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If this is the case then at least their efforts are being recognised through the 360-degree appraisal system in the case company (Fletcher, 1999). An alternative explanation is provided by the 'gender contrast' effect (Heilman et al, 1988) where the over-rating of females performing roles perceived as male-oriented, such as management, is evidenced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively recent development in the performance appraisal arena has been the increasing adoption by organisations of multi-rater feedback or 360-degree appraisal systems (Fletcher, 1999;McCarthy and Garavan, 2001). One of the reasons for its growing popularity is its perceived potential for generating more The majority of 360-degree systems include feedback from peers, subordinates, supervisors and self-ratings.…”
Section: -Degree Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that in order to break such a pattern, it is necessary to find methods of "unconditioning the mind" -of displacing the cold water with warm and further at a greater speed than that with which it was originally built up. Research consistently shows that women score lower on self-efficacy than men Carter et al 1997;Fletcher 1999;Neergaard and Eythórsdóttir 2008). This indicates that girls are conditioned in a different way and that women make choices based on different experiences to men.…”
Section: Somatic Markers and Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the literature, the validity of self-reported behaviour has been debated (Fletcher, 1999;Lindeman, Sundvik and Rouhiainen, 1995;van Esch, 2009), in addition; some members of the target audience may attempt to tell an interviewer what they want to hear even though there is little incentive for a participant to falsify information. However, Kaiser et al (2003) suggests there is research evidence that indicates self-reporting can provide valid information on an individual's ecological behaviours.…”
Section: Surveys and Self-reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%