2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of low quality bicycle paths on gaze behavior of cyclists: A field test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7 For pedestrians, natural settings and videos lead to different gaze allocation 8 and the same is expected for cyclists. Vansteenkiste et al 9 studied the visual gaze behaviour of five cyclists along a city centre route and found a greater proportion of gazes were toward the road surface when the surface quality was low than when it was high, suggesting that detection of potential obstacles was an important task. However, they did not employ a dual task or similar to distinguish critical fixations from all gaze fixations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 For pedestrians, natural settings and videos lead to different gaze allocation 8 and the same is expected for cyclists. Vansteenkiste et al 9 studied the visual gaze behaviour of five cyclists along a city centre route and found a greater proportion of gazes were toward the road surface when the surface quality was low than when it was high, suggesting that detection of potential obstacles was an important task. However, they did not employ a dual task or similar to distinguish critical fixations from all gaze fixations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has long been found that drivers will reduce speed to compensate temporary loss of visual feedback (Senders, Kristofferson et al 1967). More recently, it is also found that on rough road surfaces cyclists spend great attentional resources on monitoring proximate road properties (Vansteenkiste, Zeuwts et al 2014). This is generally in line with an early study conducted by Wilkie and Wann that found participants actively choose gaze strategies for a steering-through-slalom-gates task (Wilkie, Wann et al 2008).…”
Section: Chapter Three -Study 2: a Test Of Steering In Optic Flow Expsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…With all this said, there are obviously other issues at work in determining optimal targets for fixation. A real-world study tested the roles of fixation location during cycling along different road surfaces (smooth, high quality surface vs. rough, low quality surface) (Vansteenkiste, Zeuwts et al 2014). The authors found that shifting fixations towards proximate road properties helped cyclists maintain the desired riding speed on a rough surface.…”
Section: Visual Cues For Steeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, researchers are now executing a growing number of experiments in real-world environments. Multiple eye tracking experiments exist that analyze pedestrians' [Brügger et al 2018;Davoudian and Raynham 2012;Fotios et al 2015a,b;Kiefer et al 2014Kiefer et al , 2012Wenczel et al 2017] or cyclists' behavior [Mantuano et al 2016;Schmidt and von Stülp-nagel 2018;Vansteenkiste et al 2014]. In contrast to existing works, we are presenting a visual analytics-based approach to explore patterns, extract common eye movement strategies, and enable a combined analysis of the multi-modal data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas researchers have analyzed the visual perception of car drivers in many eye tracking experiments [Kapitaniak et al 2015], there are only few experiments performed with pedestrians and cyclists. In recent years, researchers have published a growing number of eye tracking experiments analyzing pedestrians and cyclists (e. g., [Davoudian and Raynham 2012;Kiefer et al 2012;Mantuano et al 2016;Vansteenkiste et al 2014;Wenczel et al 2017]). In this paper, we apply a visual analyticsbased method to analyze gaze behavior of pedestrians and cyclists in a real-world eye tracking experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%