2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.11436
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of institutional specificities on the income inequalities drivers in European Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also find that increasing democracy improves the marginal effect of GDP per capita growth on reducing poverty, a finding also supported by Akobeng (2016) for countries in SSA. Studying countries in the EU, Jianu et al (2020) find that inequality is less persistent in countries with inclusive institutions, and that social policy instruments and social spending are more effective in countries with inclusive institutions. The global study by Andersson and Palacio Chaverra (2017) also identifies enabling interlinkages between increasing inclusion and reducing poverty.…”
Section: Increased Participation and Inclusion Effects On Impact Clus...mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also find that increasing democracy improves the marginal effect of GDP per capita growth on reducing poverty, a finding also supported by Akobeng (2016) for countries in SSA. Studying countries in the EU, Jianu et al (2020) find that inequality is less persistent in countries with inclusive institutions, and that social policy instruments and social spending are more effective in countries with inclusive institutions. The global study by Andersson and Palacio Chaverra (2017) also identifies enabling interlinkages between increasing inclusion and reducing poverty.…”
Section: Increased Participation and Inclusion Effects On Impact Clus...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A selection of primarily qualitative studies provided evidence of enabling interlinkages between greater participation and inclusion and reducing poverty and income inequality (Akobeng, 2016;Andersson and Palacio Chaverra, 2017;Anyanwu, Erhi jakpor, and Obi, 2016;Fan, Li, Tao, and Yang, 2020;Hill et al, 2016;Jianu, Dobre, Bodislav, Radulescu, and Burlacu, 2020;Nieto-Aleman, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, Roig-Tierno, and Mas-Verdú, 2019). A further eight studies identify enabling interlinkages between increased participation and inclusion with access to basic services and equal opportunity.…”
Section: Increased Participation and Inclusion Effects On Impact Clus...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subornation, misappropriation, nepotism, or the taking of property are all examples of corruption, commonly defined as the exploitation of public or private office for personal benefit [52]. As a result, corruption leads to inefficient resource allocation or waste, raises business costs, worsens economic inequality and poverty, undermines the institutional foundation of the state and its fiscal system, and reduces public trust in the government [56]. Conversely, the informal economy is characterized as an unregistered economic activity that bolsters the GDP by evading tax payments and disregarding regulations [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, governance quality was also analyzed in terms of its relationship and correlation with economic growth, quality of life, and population wellbeing. Farkas (2019) classifies EU states based on the quality of governance, while Jianu et al (2020) categorizes the EU member states into clusters considering the concepts of inclusive and exclusive institutions, concluding that inequality remains a real problem in states with extractive institutions, which are real, specific examples of public choice theory, which operate on the basis of logrolling and rent-seeking, without involving voters in the decisions made. These disparities highlighted by the aforementioned studies pose a long-term challenge to the European Union's convergence and integration, considering the need for improvement of both institutions' quality as well as public policy development and implementation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%