2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implementation of road user charging and the lessons learnt: the case of Valletta, Malta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By 2004, 32,128 car owners had the V-licence, excluding some 5000 residents that were exempt and with only 3000 legal parking spaces available in the City, it was evident that most car owners paid the V-licence for occasional use. Despite this its contribution to the Government Consolidated Fund was considerable (s1.4 m in 2004) (Attard and Ison, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By 2004, 32,128 car owners had the V-licence, excluding some 5000 residents that were exempt and with only 3000 legal parking spaces available in the City, it was evident that most car owners paid the V-licence for occasional use. Despite this its contribution to the Government Consolidated Fund was considerable (s1.4 m in 2004) (Attard and Ison, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As identified by Attard and Ison (2010), the Controlled Vehicular Access system has a number of advantages, amongst which are that it: discriminates against commuters and encourages shorter visits for shopping and entertainment (Delia, 2007); increases parking turnover in the area closest to the city's commercial centre; allows for changes to the system to be activated easily through technology (Mamo and Dalli, 2007); allows for a fairer system of assigning residency (Delia, 2007); allows customer interaction for viewing and paying the charge (Mamo and Dalli, 2007); and allows and encourages visitors to the city during low demand. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much attention among previous studies has focused on the effects of road pricing and driving restrictions, the results of which are contradictory in various cities [5][6][7][42][43][44]. Johansson-Stenman [45] reviewed the theory of congestion pricing for roads and suggests that improved public transport or frequent use of public transport are potentially important policy complements to road pricing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main uses of ANPR is for monitoring and control of transport systems and infrastructure such as those used for bus lane enforcement (i.e. to penalise those not entitled to use them), for checking vehicle speeds or for road charging (Leape, 2006;Attard and Ison, 2010;Velaga and Pangbourne, 2014). Another common use by local authorities is for sampling of journey times along key links in the network for transport planning or management purposes or for dissemination to the public (Kuroiwa et al, 2006;Hounsell et al, 2009;Hasan et al, 2011;Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Anpr and Related Data Use For Traffic Management And Informa...mentioning
confidence: 99%