2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11770-009-0012-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implementation of an improved NPML absorbing boundary condition in elastic wave modeling

Abstract: In elastic wave forward modeling, absorbing boundary conditions (ABC) are used to mitigate undesired refl ections from the model truncation boundaries. The perfectly matched layer (PML) has proved to be the best available ABC. However, the traditional splitting PML (SPML) ABC has some serious disadvantages: for example, global SPML ABCs require much more computing memory, although the implementation is easy. The implementation of local SPML ABCs also has some diffi culties, since edges and corners must be cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both used 20th-order FD on spatial derivatives. The boundary condition is implemented by the perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition [37].…”
Section: Homogeneous Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both used 20th-order FD on spatial derivatives. The boundary condition is implemented by the perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition [37].…”
Section: Homogeneous Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use regular cubic grids in which the source function is located at one single point in the grid. To simulate an unbounded half-space (nonreflecting boundaries), we use a 3D implementation of the perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary conditions (Berenger, 1994;Zhen et al, 2009). The reflecting sea surface at the top of the model is approximated using the method described in Mittet (2002).…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical grid is regular with grid size 10 m, and is the same in the modeling and inversion. To simulate the nonreflecting boundaries, we use perfectly matching layer absorbing-boundary conditions (Berenger, 1994;Zhen et al, 2009). The reflecting free surface at the top of the model is implemented using the method described in Mittet (2002).…”
Section: Synthetic Examplementioning
confidence: 99%