1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-9936(99)00164-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implementation of accreditation in a chemical laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior work in analytical chemistry and genomics 10 - 14 has demonstrated the benefits of standardized test sample efforts for testing the reproducibility of technology platforms. To address the question of reproducibility in LC-MS-based proteomics, 15 the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) created a test samples working group to carry out a controlled study involving 27 different labs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work in analytical chemistry and genomics 10 - 14 has demonstrated the benefits of standardized test sample efforts for testing the reproducibility of technology platforms. To address the question of reproducibility in LC-MS-based proteomics, 15 the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) created a test samples working group to carry out a controlled study involving 27 different labs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the implementation improved systematic recording and control of the tasks, robustness of the traceability chain and external recognition of quality of the laboratory. Cortez (1999) found accredited laboratories had more satisfactory and less suspicious and unsatisfactory laboratory performances than non-accredited laboratories. Thus, they claimed accredited laboratories were more succesful than non-accredited laboratories.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The second one makes reference to including Good Laboratory Practices and the ISO 9000 certification as competition factors. Cortez (1999) speaks about the importance of setting a distinction between the certification and the accreditation for a www.intechopen.com laboratory, as the first one makes reference to the evaluation on the quality system's requirements, while the second one not only covers such aspect, but it also evaluates the laboratory's technical competency. In that way, the certification processes as well as the ones of accreditation are applied in testing and calibration laboratories, certification of quality and environmental systems, products certification, personnel and inspection.…”
Section: Metrology In Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%