2016
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-16-0143.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Imperfect Phase Pattern of Real Parabolic Radar Antenna and Data Quality

Abstract: Although antennas have well-known power patterns that are commonly used to understand the quality of measurements, they also have phase patterns that are difficult to obtain and are seldom discussed in the radar meteorological community. This study presents the characteristics of the antenna phase pattern of the McGill S-band radar. Phase variations in azimuth and elevation with respect to the main beam axis are obtained using high-resolution scans of an isolated ground target and of an emission source. The tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential impact of assimilating both radar data and retrieved thermodynamic information remains unclear, and most studies have focused on areas of strong convection. Themens and Fabry (2014) described the potential benefit of providing temperature and humidity information over 3D domains for mesoscale forecasting, and high-density thermodynamic information has been successfully retrieved from radar data Feng and Fabry 2016;Ellis and Vivekanandan 2011) despite some concerns related to accuracy and bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential impact of assimilating both radar data and retrieved thermodynamic information remains unclear, and most studies have focused on areas of strong convection. Themens and Fabry (2014) described the potential benefit of providing temperature and humidity information over 3D domains for mesoscale forecasting, and high-density thermodynamic information has been successfully retrieved from radar data Feng and Fabry 2016;Ellis and Vivekanandan 2011) despite some concerns related to accuracy and bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%