The Imperatives of Sustainable Development

Abstract

The United Nations sustainable development goals are under fire. By attempting to cover all that is good and desirable in society, these targets have ended up as vague, weak, or meaningless. We suggest a model for sustainable development based on three moral imperatives: satisfying human needs, ensuring social equity, and respecting environmental limits. The model reflects Our Common Future's central message, moral imperatives laid out in philosophical texts on needs and equity, and recent scientific insights on environmental limits. The model is in conflict with the popular three‐pillar model of sustainable development, which seeks to balance social, environmental, and economic targets. Rather, we argue that sustainable development constitutes a set of constraints on human behaviour, including constraints on economic activity. By identifying indicators, and thresholds, we illustrate that different regions or groups of countries face different challenges. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Sustainable Construction Risk Perceptions in the Kuwaiti Construction Industry

“…While these broad objectives are necessary, their abstractness can make it challenging for construction professionals to know how to achieve them [1]. This is because the techniques and approaches that are optimal for specific projects vary depending on the geographic location, regional energy sources, community characteristics, stakeholder priorities, and many other variables.…”

Strengthening the Human Right to Sanitation as an Instrument for Inclusive Development

“…Similarly, the integration of broader sanitation components beyond excreta management coupled with minimum indicators for sustainability under Sphere (see 6.5) and the principle of avoiding harm in humanitarian assistance (see 6.3.4) also enhances ecological inclusion by preventing the contamination of the environment (Obani, 2017). Nonetheless, environmental sustainability may also constrain the choice of technologies and modalities for service provision where necessary to avoid environmental pollution (Feris, 2015;Holden, Linnerud & Banister, 2016). …”

Livelihood Implications and Perceptions of Large Scale Investment in Natural Resources for Conservation and Carbon Sequestration: Empirical Evidence from REDD+ in Vietnam

“…Building upon our research, the last part of this article provides several policy recommendations on both the macro-and micro-level. On macro-level, it is important that the SDGs are not simply perceived as goals that can be "traded off" with one another [64]. While SDG 13 (climate action) is important, it should not be achieved at the expense of SDG1 (poverty alleviation) or SDG2 (food security).…”