2011
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2010.544742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of tourism at a UNESCO heritage site in China – a need for a meta-narrative? The case of the Kaiping Diaolou

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The conditions of each context (e.g., topography, heritage, culture, history, and infrastructure) create results that, although they might have some common characteristics with other places, are still unique to the local area (Almeida, et al, 2015;Ryan, Chaozhi, & Zeng, 2011 does not explain why they have such perceptions (Sharpley, 2014). Thus, a further qualitative analysis would be useful to strengthen the explanations provided, delving into the different profiles that have emerged in our analysis (Deery, Jago & Fredline, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions of each context (e.g., topography, heritage, culture, history, and infrastructure) create results that, although they might have some common characteristics with other places, are still unique to the local area (Almeida, et al, 2015;Ryan, Chaozhi, & Zeng, 2011 does not explain why they have such perceptions (Sharpley, 2014). Thus, a further qualitative analysis would be useful to strengthen the explanations provided, delving into the different profiles that have emerged in our analysis (Deery, Jago & Fredline, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She found that residents of both heritage sites have positive perceptions and attitudes toward local tourism development, due to the growth of employment and income, regardless of negative effects like cost of living, general prices for goods and services, noise, crime and congestion. Ryan, Chaozhi and Zeng [9] examined the residents' perceptions of the impact of tourism at UNESCO heritage site in China-Kaiping Diaolou, a destination in an early stage of tourism development. The research has shown that residents have positive attitudes about UNESCO designation of a World Heritage Site and about socio-cultural and economic effects tourism development has on their lives.…”
Section: Residents' Attitudes Toward Tourism Development In World Hermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of studies focused on local residents' attitudes in World Heritage Sites [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], but there has not been any research dealing with local residents' attitudes towards different forms of tourism development (CTD and SITD). Therefore, this paper could be potentially valuable for those researchers who explore local residents' attitudes toward special interest tourism development generally and in World Heritage Sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the availability of books, book chapters and journal articles related to mixed methods, few of the 56 studies that applied mixed methods actually referenced the literature on mixed methods to justify their approach. In this regard, only nine works (Lynch, Duinker, Sheehan y Chute, 2010;Ryan, Chaozhi and Zeng, 2011;Chancellor, Norman, Farmer and Coe, 2011;Su and Wall, 2012;Canavan, 2014;Ong and Smith, 2014;Puhakka, Cottrell and Siikamäki, 2014;Albrecht, 2014;Walker and Moscardo, 2014) included in their lists of references any methodological studies about mixed methods from the main mixed methodologists (works by Creswell, Greene, Johnson, Onwuegbuzie, Tashakkori, Teddlie, among others). On this evidence it seems likely that the advantages and potential benefits of mixed methods research may be unknown to the majority of sustainable tourism researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%