2017
DOI: 10.1111/een.12482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of predators and parasites on wild bumblebee colonies

Abstract: 1. The study of wild bumblebee nests has been hindered by the difficulty in locating and observing them. Here, wild nests were located using a sniffer dog and volunteers. The entrances to 32 nests were filmed continuously to identify successful nests (those which produced gynes) and observe vertebrate species interactions. 2. Of the 47 nests, 71% and 21% produced gynes in 2010 and 2011, respectively. 3. A total of 39 vertebrate species were filmed at entrances but the majority did not interact with the nests. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
64
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
64
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, Goulson et al. ). This pathogen is transmitted when feces from an infected individual are consumed by an uninfected bee (Durrer and Schmid‐Hempel ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Goulson et al. ). This pathogen is transmitted when feces from an infected individual are consumed by an uninfected bee (Durrer and Schmid‐Hempel ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crithidia bombi [Kinetoplastea, Trypanosomatida] is a common pathogen of multiple bumble bee species (Gillespie, 2010) that can be contracted at flowers and transferred among nest mates via faecal-oral transmission (Durrer & Schmid-Hempel, 1994). Wild B. terrestris colonies infected with C. bombi are less likely to produce new daughter queens compared with uninfected colonies (Goulson et al, 2017). Crithidia infection reduced queen colony founding success and colony size (Brown et al, 2003), and reduced motor learning rates of flower handling in B. impatiens (Gegear et al, 2005), which could influence how effectively bumble bees pollinate and forage (Koch et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource availability can differ between habitats (Baude et al, ) and can be impacted by human activity that results in habitat loss and fragmentation (Goulson, Nicholls, Botías, & Rotheray, ; Potts et al, ). In contrast, top‐down regulation refers to factors that cause mortality: these can be human‐induced, for example, as a result of pesticide use (Gill, Ramos‐Rodriguez, & Raine, ; Rundlöf et al, ), or they can be natural, for example, disease (Manley, Boots, & Wilfert, ) or predation (Goulson, O'Connor, & Park, , ). Top‐down effects which cause direct mortality act alongside bottom‐up regulatory effects to influence the stability of bumblebee populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which predation of bumblebee nests has an impact on bumblebee populations is relatively unknown. In Europe, nest predators include birds, such as great tits (Parsus major), which predate workers entering and exiting the nest (Goulson, O'Connor, & Park, 2018b), and wax moths (Aphomia sociella), which infest colonies and destroy most of the comb (Alford, 1975;Goulson, Hughes, Derwent, & Stout, 2002;Pouvreau, 1973;Sladen, 1912). There is little evidence that either of these two nest predators have negative impacts on colonies in terms of gyne production (Goulson, O'Connor, & Park, 2018a;Goulson et al, 2018b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%