2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of mining on the food sovereignty and security of Indigenous Peoples and local communities: A global review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study analyzed 480 bibliographies from all Scopus databases on agriculture, artisanal mining, and rural. The first publication was recorded in 2002 through the work of Mwanza and Kabamba, while the most recent 2023 was from Blanco et al (2023). Scientific studies occupied the position of the most types of publications, influential, and cited documents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study analyzed 480 bibliographies from all Scopus databases on agriculture, artisanal mining, and rural. The first publication was recorded in 2002 through the work of Mwanza and Kabamba, while the most recent 2023 was from Blanco et al (2023). Scientific studies occupied the position of the most types of publications, influential, and cited documents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discussion of this study was in Belgian, and its title was English-based. The last publication was in 2023 with the work of Blanco et al (Blanco et al, 2023) on "The impacts of mining on the food sovereignty and security of indigenous peoples and local communities: A global review". It analyzed 403 studies to explain the combination of mining, social inequality, and weak environmental stewardship adversely affecting food sovereignty.Despite the fluctuations, the application of this topic seems to have increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about these impacts is retrieved from the same secondary sources used to create and verify conflict entries, i.e., scholarly papers, civil society reports, lawsuits, formal complaints, and newspaper articles. The use of such nonacademic knowledge sources (e.g., newspaper accounts) has become commonplace in the study of protest events ( 63 ), and local reports about social-ecological impacts have become important data sources to complement other scientific impact assessments, particularly in the context of limited data availability ( 64 , 65 ). Furthermore, reported and perceived impacts are important to consider, because they partake in creating people’s realities and affected communities often act in response to them ( 17 , 66 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%