2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0030605321000806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of human activity on mammals in a community forest near the Dja Biosphere Reserve in Cameroon

Abstract: Human activity in African tropical rainforests continues to threaten wild mammals. Many rural communities are dependent on hunting, yet there is a widespread lack of baseline data on ecology and the sustainability of hunting. We investigated the impacts of human activity on mammal species composition and distributions within a community forest surrounding a village in the buffer zone of the Dja Biosphere Reserve in south-east Cameroon. We conducted a camera-trap survey in August–November 2017 and detected 24 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In southeast Cameroon, Dancer (2019) found that parks are targeted by poachers; the lack of funding usually does not allow for permanent surveillance by rangers compared to FMU. Therefore, the lack of detection of forest elephants in community forests which is part of the CL in the southeast of Cameroon as reported by Tudge et al (2022), suggest that, compared to our study area, the pressure on forest elephants might be low enough to allow them to occur in all land use types. Also, forest elephants were detected at least once every month in each land use types.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In southeast Cameroon, Dancer (2019) found that parks are targeted by poachers; the lack of funding usually does not allow for permanent surveillance by rangers compared to FMU. Therefore, the lack of detection of forest elephants in community forests which is part of the CL in the southeast of Cameroon as reported by Tudge et al (2022), suggest that, compared to our study area, the pressure on forest elephants might be low enough to allow them to occur in all land use types. Also, forest elephants were detected at least once every month in each land use types.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Camera trap photos were date and time stamped. We used an independence interval of 30 min for species at the same camera trap station (Chakraborty et al, 2021; Deith & Brodie, 2020; O’Brien et al, 2003; Tudge et al, 2022). Photos with multiple individuals of the same species at the same camera trap station on the same time frame was considered a single detection event (Chakraborty et al, 2021).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest is degraded, and fragmented, as intense logging, hunting and crops occur in the area (Arlet & Molleman, 2010; Ávila et al, 2019; Betti, 2004; Tagg et al, 2018). Based on previous studies from different localities, we assume that the agricultural fields in Dja can attract animals (such as chimpanzees), resulting in crop-raiding with defecation (Arlet & Molleman, 2010; Tudge, Brittain, Kentatchime, Kamogne Tagne, & Rowcliffe, 2022). Local people often walk barefoot through Dja agricultural fields and eat crops straight from the ground without previously washing them (Table 3) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we determined that gathering presence–absence data at a 1 km 2 site resolution would allow the most informative comparison. Since the home ranges of the larger species in our study area are typically larger than 1 km 2 , we interpreted occupancy as the proportion of sites used by a species (MacKenzie et al, 2006; Tudge et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we determined that gathering presence-absence data at a 1 km 2 site resolution would allow the most informative F I G U R E 1 Location of the Dja faunal reserve and approximate location of the study village in southeastern Cameroon, with surrounding production and community forests comparison. Since the home ranges of the larger species in our study area are typically larger than 1 km 2 , we interpreted occupancy as the proportion of sites used by a species (MacKenzie et al, 2006;Tudge et al, 2022).…”
Section: Camera Trapsmentioning
confidence: 99%