2022
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of electronic versus waiter ordering on consumer's healthy food choice

Abstract: With the advancement of technology and the widespread of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, catering operators have favored electronic ordering due to its convenience and safety. However, little research has examined whether the change from traditional waiter ordering to electronic device ordering would affect consumers' healthy eating. Based on previous research of self‐control, this article explores whether ordering by electronic device or waiter prompts healthier food choices. Through four experimental stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, it is self‐evident that a small set of product options is less likely to satisfy consumers' various needs and tastes than a large one (Hoch et al, 1999; Kahn, 1998). On the other hand, consumers might feel that they have not dedicated enough time to the choice task if choosing from a small choice set than from a large one and apply the lay theory that “a quick choice is a bad choice” when evaluating the chosen option (Hahn et al, 1992; Wu et al, 2022). As a consequence, they might feel less satisfied with the option they choose from a small (vs. large) choice set, and featuring the low quantity with the use of a dividing line might decrease their post‐choice satisfaction, as manifested by more choice regret and greater switching behavior (Antón et al, 2007; Cooke et al, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it is self‐evident that a small set of product options is less likely to satisfy consumers' various needs and tastes than a large one (Hoch et al, 1999; Kahn, 1998). On the other hand, consumers might feel that they have not dedicated enough time to the choice task if choosing from a small choice set than from a large one and apply the lay theory that “a quick choice is a bad choice” when evaluating the chosen option (Hahn et al, 1992; Wu et al, 2022). As a consequence, they might feel less satisfied with the option they choose from a small (vs. large) choice set, and featuring the low quantity with the use of a dividing line might decrease their post‐choice satisfaction, as manifested by more choice regret and greater switching behavior (Antón et al, 2007; Cooke et al, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers count on branding elements for food expectations and purchase decisions (Chandon, 2013). Branding attributes (e.g., brand names, brand logos, brand personality) provide a rich source of information, and expectations and help consumers reduce the risks associated with food choices (e.g., Keller, 2003; Qian et al, 2023; Shimp & DeLozier, 1986; Wu et al, 2022). Research suggests that specific brand elements can influence consumers' perceptions and preferences for the brand/product (e.g., Ilicic & Brennan, 2023; Techawachirakul et al, 2022, 2023; Zou et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%