2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact toughness of novel keyhole TIG welded duplex stainless steel joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keyhole tungsten inert gas (K-TIG) welding is a kind of high-energy beam welding method. It can be welded in a single-pass welding and formed on both sides without filling the welding material [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. In this paper, different welding speeds were applied to analyze the influence of cooling rate on morphology, mechanical properties, and microstructure of the 2205 DSS welds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keyhole tungsten inert gas (K-TIG) welding is a kind of high-energy beam welding method. It can be welded in a single-pass welding and formed on both sides without filling the welding material [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. In this paper, different welding speeds were applied to analyze the influence of cooling rate on morphology, mechanical properties, and microstructure of the 2205 DSS welds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of welding speed on the morphology and microstructure of welded joints were studied. And draw the following conclusions: In DSS materials, the cooling rate also affects the two-phase balance [21][22][23]. When the welding speeds were 280-340 mm/min, the austenite content of the WMZ were 44.8%, 42.1%, 37.4% and 32.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The impact toughness values of the BM and WM in the ULK-TIG welded joint are shown in Figure 3. To compare the impact toughness of ULK-TIG WM (underwater WM) with the impact toughness of onshore K-TIG WM (onshore WM), the impact toughness of onshore WM was obtained from previous research [13], and is also presented in Figure 3. The mean values of impact toughness in the BM and underwater WM were 261.7 J/cm 2 and 168.7 J/cm 2 , respectively, while the mean value of impact toughness for onshore WM was 216.3 J/cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM fracture surfaces of the ULK-TIG welded joint after Charpy impact tests. ( a ) BM, ( b ) underwater WM and ( c ) onshore WM [13]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%