1997
DOI: 10.1080/07408179708966363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact on rack configuration on the speed profile of the storage and retrieval machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is a good alternative configuration for the optimal one as the resulting expected travel time is only about 3% off the optimum. This is in line with the findings by Rosenblatt and Eynan (1989) and Chang and Wen (1997) for 2-dimensional SIT racks with single and dual-command cycles, respectively. They conclude that "The expected travel times are fairly insensitive to slight deviations in the optimal rack configuration".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is a good alternative configuration for the optimal one as the resulting expected travel time is only about 3% off the optimum. This is in line with the findings by Rosenblatt and Eynan (1989) and Chang and Wen (1997) for 2-dimensional SIT racks with single and dual-command cycles, respectively. They conclude that "The expected travel times are fairly insensitive to slight deviations in the optimal rack configuration".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…They consider the system under random storage assignment, single and dual-command cycles. Chang and Wen (1997) extend this travel time model to investigate the impact on the rack configuration. The optimal rack configuration for single-command cycles still appears to be SIT, whereas this may not be the case for dual-command cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…unit load Houshyar and Chung (1991) unit load x Taboun and Bhole (1993) unit load x x Randhawa and Shroff (1995) unit load x x x x unit load x Potrč et al (2004) unit load and multi shuttle x x simulation and analytical Rosenblatt et al (1993) unit load x x x x analytical Karasawa et al (1980) unit load x x Zollinger (1982) unit load x x Ashayeri et al (1985) unit load x Azadivar (1987) unit load x Bozer and White (1990) end-of-aisle miniload x Van Oudheusden and Zhu (1992) person-on-board x Bozer and White (1996) end-of-aisle miniload x x Chang and Wen (1997) unit load x Hwang and Ko (1998) unit load x x Park et al (1999) end-of-aisle miniload x Malmborg (2001a) unit load x x Malmborg (2001b) multi shuttle Malmborg (2002 and2003a) autonomous vehicle S/R x x Koh et al (2005) end-of-aisle miniload x Lee et al (2005) unit load x Table 2: Overview of research in design models that can assist in decision making for physical design in combination with control issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compact forms of expected travel-times under randomized storage conditions are determined for both SC and DC cycles. An extension of Chang et al (1995) was proposed by Chang and Wen (1997) to investigate the impact on rack configuration on the speed profile of the stacker crane. The results demonstrate that the optimal rack configuration of the SC is square-in-time whereas the DC cycle may not be.…”
Section: Operating Characteristics Of the Stacker Cranementioning
confidence: 99%