2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0939-3625(02)00058-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of uncertainty on firm investment: evidence from machinery industry in Liaoning province of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the coefficients for Tobin's Q and Sg are not statistically different from zero. Therefore, we find no evidence in support to the accelerator theory of investment, which corroborates with Baum et al (2010) and Bo and Zhang (2002). Furthermore, diagnostic tests are provided at the end of each table.…”
Section: Estimation Techniquementioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the coefficients for Tobin's Q and Sg are not statistically different from zero. Therefore, we find no evidence in support to the accelerator theory of investment, which corroborates with Baum et al (2010) and Bo and Zhang (2002). Furthermore, diagnostic tests are provided at the end of each table.…”
Section: Estimation Techniquementioning
confidence: 46%
“…However, SOEs in the transition economy have never faced demand uncertainty, and they are not affected by uncertainty in factor markets in a transition economy. Bo and Zhang (2002) find an insignificant influence of demand and supply uncertainties on investment for state enterprises of the Chinese machinery industry, whereas the investment of collective enterprises is positively affected by labor cost uncertainty. The aforementioned research finds no evidence supporting accelerator theory of investment for their sample firms.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, most empirical studies of firms' investment behaviors use either the Q model or the accelerator model (e.g. Lensink and Sterken 2000 ; Bo and Zhang 2002 ). While the panel data we use do not have sufficient data points in the time series direction to construct Q for each sample firm, the data do allow us to estimate an accelerator model, which may be written as follows: …”
Section: Empirical Approach and Descriptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, researchers follow two distinct approaches. On the one hand, researchers measure uncertainty using micro data; for instance Ninh et al (2004), Darku (2000), and Pattillo (1998) proxy uncertainty using firms' expectations of future sales, supply, and/or sales growth and Leefmans (2011), Shiferaw (2009, and Bo and Zhang (2002) measure uncertainty using data on firms' volatility of supply and/or demand and/or labour costs. On the other hand, Kumo (2006), Aizenman and Marion (1999), Serven (1998), and Serven and Solimano (1993) conduct a macroeconomic study where uncertainty measurements include volatility of GDP growth, volatility of real effective exchange rate, term of trade volatility, inflation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%