2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of two-product joint lifecycles on capacity planning of remanufacturing networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Flapper (2003) claims that the latter are strongly influenced by the factors that originally motivated the company to define them, while Fleischmann (2001) states that in order to successfully exploit the opportunities of recovering value from used products, companies need to design a logistics structure that facilitates the optimal management of goods' flows. To this end, decisions need to be taken on how to collect recoverable products from the former user, where to grade collected products in order to separate recoverable resources from scrap, where to reprocess collected products to make them fit for reuse, how to plan capacity and production process (see, for example, Georgiadis and Athanasiou, 2010) and how to distribute recovered products to future customers. More specifically, some indicative strategies suggested by researchers (Pokharel andMutha, 2009, Guide, 2000 etc.…”
Section: Environmental Consciousness and Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flapper (2003) claims that the latter are strongly influenced by the factors that originally motivated the company to define them, while Fleischmann (2001) states that in order to successfully exploit the opportunities of recovering value from used products, companies need to design a logistics structure that facilitates the optimal management of goods' flows. To this end, decisions need to be taken on how to collect recoverable products from the former user, where to grade collected products in order to separate recoverable resources from scrap, where to reprocess collected products to make them fit for reuse, how to plan capacity and production process (see, for example, Georgiadis and Athanasiou, 2010) and how to distribute recovered products to future customers. More specifically, some indicative strategies suggested by researchers (Pokharel andMutha, 2009, Guide, 2000 etc.…”
Section: Environmental Consciousness and Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies consider stochastic parameters; however, we try to develop a new solution methodology for a deterministic model. Georgiadis and Athanasiou [20] extends the system dynamic-based simulation model by Georgiadis et al [21] by considering two sequential product lifecycles of two product types under two market scenarios with regard to customer preferences over the product types. Recently, they have dealt with long-term demand-driven capacity planning policies in the reverse supply chains with remanufacturing under high capacity acquisition cost coupled with uncertainty in actual demand, sales patterns, and quality, and timing of end-of-use product returns [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Morgan and Gagnon [12] organized and reviewed journals up to 2011 with the intention of gathering a progression timeline of remanufacturing. The impact of two-product joint life cycles on the capacity planning of remanufacturing networks was presented by Georgiadis and Athanasiou [13]. The authors put emphasis on the inherent uncertainties of remanufacturing systems and proposed a system dynamics model design representing capacity-planning experiments.…”
Section: Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing and End-of-life Prodmentioning
confidence: 99%