2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07290-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of traumatic herniated discs in cervical facets dislocations treatments: systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the repair did not exacerbate their neurological symptoms, and all patients had these disk abnormalities resolved following the reduction [26]. A previous systematic review also noted that neurological worsening after spinal realignment with cranial-cervical traction was rare [27]. In this research, there were no cases of permanent worsening of the neurological symptoms owing to closed reduction, and we believe that this procedure can be carried out safely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, the repair did not exacerbate their neurological symptoms, and all patients had these disk abnormalities resolved following the reduction [26]. A previous systematic review also noted that neurological worsening after spinal realignment with cranial-cervical traction was rare [27]. In this research, there were no cases of permanent worsening of the neurological symptoms owing to closed reduction, and we believe that this procedure can be carried out safely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…MRI is the method of choice to evaluate the severity of canal stenosis and detect spinal cord injury and potentially harmful associated disc herniation [ 17 , 18 ]. Here, MRI confirmed the dislocation, ruled out disc herniation, showed severe cord compression, and established myelopathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Fallbeispiel einer unilateralen, nicht dislozierten Facettenfraktur HWK 7 (AO Spine F1). Die Fragmentgröße beträgt mit 8,4 mm weniger als 40% der kontralateralen Massa lateralis (23,7 mm aber in nur 0,5% der Fälle zu einer neurologischen Verschlechterung bei geschlossener oder dorsal offener Reposition mit bekanntem traumatischen Bandscheibenvorfall [65]. Eine Verzögerung der operativen Therapie durch diese diagnostische Maßnahme sollte daher nicht akzeptiert werden.…”
Section: Operative Therapieunclassified