2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy on appendicostomy operation rates for children with chronic constipation—a single-institution experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It accounts for 3-5 % of visits to pediatricians and 10-25 % to pediatric gastroenterologists [7]. About 30 % of Dutch children continue to have ORIS throughout adolescence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It accounts for 3-5 % of visits to pediatricians and 10-25 % to pediatric gastroenterologists [7]. About 30 % of Dutch children continue to have ORIS throughout adolescence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the treatment is to achieve and maintain regular bowel movements free of symptoms [1,6]. Laxatives remain the mainstay of maintenance therapy of ORSI; yet, there is no standard laxative therapy despite the varieties of medication currently available [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, several studies have used the same frequencies and device (EPM IF 4160 Fuji Dynamics Ltd, Kowloon, Hong Kong). 52 In these studies, a 4-kHz carrier frequency is selected with a beat frequency sweep of 80-160 Hz with a variable intensity of < 33 mA in adults. The beat frequency sweep varied in pediatric studies from 80-120 Hz to 80-150 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2006, appendicostomy-formation rates at our institute have significantly reduced in STC but not in non-STC children, coinciding with the introduction of TES as an alternative treatment for STC [48]. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation has not been tested on non-STC children in this period.…”
Section: Box 1 Effects Of Tes In Patients In Stcmentioning
confidence: 99%