“…Passing the meteorological conditions into an air-quality model at a higher temporal resolution or running the chemistry online within a meteorological model is preferable but requires significantly more computational resources (Grell et al 2004). Even though performing offline high-spatial-resolution air-quality model simulations with coarse temporal meteorological inputs adds some uncertainty to the results by underestimating the variability of vertical transport (Grell et al 2004), this approach has been used in a number of previous studies to allow for key insights to be gained on how complex environments (i.e., topography, coastlines, urban centers, and industrial complexes) and/or small-scale processes (i.e., sulfate formation and boundary layer venting through fair-weather cumulus clouds and localscale circulations, such as sea breezes) affect air quality (Gonçalves et al 2009;Im et al 2010;Jimenez et al 2005Jimenez et al , 2006Jimenez et al , 2007Lee et al 2008;Loughner et al 2011;Ortega et al 2009;Parra et al 2006;Perez et al 2006;San Jose et al 2007;Stein et al 2007;Yu et al 2008). Even though performing offline high-spatial-resolution air-quality model simulations with coarse temporal meteorological inputs adds some uncertainty to the results by underestimating the variability of vertical transport (Grell et al 2004), this approach has been used in a number of previous studies to allow for key insights to be gained on how complex environments (i.e., topography, coastlines, urban centers, and industrial complexes) and/or small-scale processes (i.e., sulfate formation and boundary layer venting through fair-weather cumulus clouds and localscale circulations, such as sea breezes) affect air quality (Gonçalves et al 2009;Im et al 2010;Jimenez et al 2005Jimenez et al , 2006Jimenez et al , 2007Lee et al 2008;Loughner et al 2011;Ortega et al 2009;Parra et al 2006;Perez et al 2006;San Jose et al 2007;Stein et al 2007;Yu et al 2008).…”