2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-010-4110-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of time synchronization error on passive coherent pulsed radar system

Abstract: Passive bistatic coherent radar system operates with distinct non-cooperative transmitter and receiver located at different sites. In such spatial separation, the receiving system needs to independently solve the problem of time and phase synchronization via direct-path signal. The impact of time synchronization error was explored and solved in passive bistatic coherent radar. The common model of digital sampling process is introduced to illustrate the effect of time synchronization error (TSE). The periodicit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will destroy the coherence among pluses and will affect the radar imaging. Detailed theoretical analysis is completed in [4], [5]. In this paper, analysis conclusion is quoted directly.…”
Section: Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It will destroy the coherence among pluses and will affect the radar imaging. Detailed theoretical analysis is completed in [4], [5]. In this paper, analysis conclusion is quoted directly.…”
Section: Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is caused by no-uniform sampling. No-uniform sampling destroys the coherence among pulses, and leads to several spectrum lines appear [4,5].…”
Section: Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Synchronisation errors and their impact in another pulsed radar system were analysed in ref. [27]. The impact of the loss of synchronisation of the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is calculated in ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%