2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of tidal disruption events on galactic habitability

Abstract: Tidal Disruption Events (TDEs) are characterized by the emission of a short burst of high-energy radiation. We analyze the cumulative impact of TDEs on galactic habitability using the Milky Way as a proxy. We show that X-rays and extreme ultraviolet (XUV) radiation emitted during TDEs can cause hydrodynamic escape and instigate biological damage. By taking the appropriate variables into consideration, such as the efficiency of atmospheric escape and distance from the Galactic center, we demonstrate that the im… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our current work in tandem with publications on the negative impacts of high-energy radiation from AGN (Balbi & Tombesi 2017;Lingam et al 2019), as well as the contributions from tidal disruption events (Pacetti et al 2020), collectively suggests that the innermost ∼ 1 kpc of the Milky Way is not readily conducive to the existence of biospheres on the surfaces of rocky planets. This tentative conclusion should be seen as complementary in scope to the papers cited in the prior paragraph because the latter did not incorporate SMBH activity in their modelling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our current work in tandem with publications on the negative impacts of high-energy radiation from AGN (Balbi & Tombesi 2017;Lingam et al 2019), as well as the contributions from tidal disruption events (Pacetti et al 2020), collectively suggests that the innermost ∼ 1 kpc of the Milky Way is not readily conducive to the existence of biospheres on the surfaces of rocky planets. This tentative conclusion should be seen as complementary in scope to the papers cited in the prior paragraph because the latter did not incorporate SMBH activity in their modelling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In the past few years, there has been a flurry of activity directed toward ascertaining the impact of the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) on habitability on galactic scales, encompassing both active galactic nuclei (AGN) (Balbi & Tombesi 2017;Chen et al 2018;Lingam et al 2019; Amaro-Seoane & Chen 2019; Wisłocka et al 2019;Liu et al 2020) as well as tidal disruption events (TDEs) (Pacetti et al 2020). However, these studies delved exclusively into the positive and negative ramifications ★ E-mail: balbi@roma2.infn.it † E-mail: mlingam@fit.edu of electromagnetic radiation (e.g., X-rays, ultraviolet radiation, and optical light) emitted during the peak activity of the central SMBH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis we have not considered other aspects which are investigated by recent works in the context of galactic habitability. For example, the combined action of tidal disruption events (Pacetti et al 2020) and the active phase of the central black hole (Balbi & Tombesi 2017) further reduce the habitability of the bulge. Moreover, a proper evaluation of the habitability of the bulge should also account for the relatively higher probability of stellar encounters which can perturb planetary orbital configuration but, on the other hand, also favor lithopanspernia (Melosh 1988;Wesson 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not consider other aspects that were investigated in recent works in the context of Galactic habitability. For example, the combined action of tidal disruption events (Pacetti et al 2020) and the active phase of the central black hole (Balbi & Tombesi 2017) further reduce the habitability of the bulge. Moreover, a detailed evaluation of the habitability of the bulge should also account for the relatively higher probability of stellar encounters that can perturb planetary orbital configuration, but on the other hand, also favor lithopanspernia (Melosh 1988;Wesson 2010).…”
Section: The Galaxymentioning
confidence: 99%