The impact of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in defending legal challenges to tobacco control measures

Abstract

backgroundSince the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control's (FCTC) entry into force, the tobacco industry has initiated litigation challenging tobacco control measures implemented by governments around the world, or supported others to initiate such litigation on its behalf. In defending their tobacco control measures against such litigation, governments have invoked their obligations and rights under the WHO FCTC. We assess the extent to which the WHO FCTC has provided legal weight to governments' defences against legal challenge. Methods We reviewed 96 court decisions concerning legal challenges to tobacco control measures, determining whether or not they cited the WHO FCTC and their outcomes. We then reviewed the cases where the WHO FCTC was cited, analysing how the WHO FCTC contributed to the resolution of the case. Results The WHO FCTC was cited in 45 decisions. Decisions both citing and not citing the WHO FCTC were largely decided in favour of governments, with 80% of WHO-FCTC-citing and 67% of non-WHO-FCTCciting cases upholding the measure in its entirety and on every ground of challenge. In cases where it was cited, the WHO FCTC contributed to the resolution of the case in favour of governments by providing a legal basis for measures, demonstrating the measure's public health purpose, demonstrating the evidence in favour of a measure, demonstrating international consensus, demonstrating that a measure promotes or protects health-related human rights and demonstrating whether or not a measure is reasonable, proportionate or justifiable. Conclusions The way the WHO FCTC has been cited in court decisions suggests that it has made a substantial contribution to courts' reasoning in tobacco control legal challenges and has strengthened government's arguments in defending litigation.

Comparing Tobacco and Alcohol Policies From a Health Systems Perspective: The Cases of the Philippines and Singapore

“…From a global health perspective, the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) has been a powerful legal framework and a foundation for the development and implementation of tobacco control policies in countries at various economic development levels [3,4]. While tobacco control implementation has been assessed using the World Bank's Tobacco Control Scale, the WHO FCTC and health systems frameworks, alcohol control policies vis-à-vis the WHO Global Strategy to Reduce Harmful Use of Alcohol (Global Alcohol Strategy hereafter) have yet to be assessed using a systems perspective [5][6][7][8][9].…”

Using Human Rights Law to Progress Alcohol Control

“…WHO FCTC implementation and human rights obligations has been recognised and relied upon to defend legal challenges to tobacco control measures. 88…”

Litigation in tobacco control: past, present and future

“…From the above, we can see the significance of international laws and policy frameworks to much of this litigation, both as a forum for such litigation in the case of trade and investment agreements, and as norms which are applied in domestic courts, in the case of arguments on human rights or intellectual property. The WHO FCTC in particular has had a remarkable impact on shaping many aspects of tobacco control litigation 31 32. It has:…”