2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2006 Main Conference Proceedings)(WI'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/wi.2006.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Web Prefetching Architecture on the Limits of Reducing User's Perceived Latency

Abstract: Abstract-Web prefetching is a technique that has been researched for years to reduce the latency perceived by users. For this purpose, several web prefetching architectures have been used, but no comparative study has been performed to identify the best architecture dealing with prefetching. This paper analyzes the impact of the web prefetching architecture focusing on the limits of reducing the user's perceived latency. To this end, the factors that constrain the predictive power of each architecture are anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because predictors falling in this category cannot predict accesses to those resources that have not been requested before to the element where the predictor is placed (first-seen resources). As expected, the ratio of first-seen resources is low when predictors are located at the server but high when located at the client [19]. However, this limitation can be overcome if additional sources of information are provided to the prediction engine.…”
Section: Sequence Of Requestsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because predictors falling in this category cannot predict accesses to those resources that have not been requested before to the element where the predictor is placed (first-seen resources). As expected, the ratio of first-seen resources is low when predictors are located at the server but high when located at the client [19]. However, this limitation can be overcome if additional sources of information are provided to the prediction engine.…”
Section: Sequence Of Requestsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The element of the web architecture (i.e., client, proxy or server) in which the prediction engine is implemented is also a performance limiting factor for prediction engines of this type [19,29]. This is because predictors falling in this category cannot predict accesses to those resources that have not been requested before to the element where the predictor is placed (first-seen resources).…”
Section: Sequence Of Requestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With those traces, they conclude that combining a large browser cache with deltacompression could permit to reduce latency only by 14.4%, whereas a perfect predictor could save latency by 28.5%. Domenech et al [9] studied the impact of the web architecture on the limits of latency reduction. They identified that the main constraint to obtain the upper bound in latency savings is due to the situation in which a user access cannot be predicted, e.g., the first access of a session and the first time the predictor sees an object.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies [7][8][9][10] focus on the maximum performance achievable through web prefetching and the main constraints to reach it. Some of these works study the upper bounds in performance of web prefetching from a theoretical point of view but, to the best of our knowledge, none of them has empirically analyzed how real restrictions affect the benefits of prefetching.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Markov predictor uses prediction by partial match (PPM) to find recurring sequences of events. Many proposals for web prefetching use PPM based on Markov predictors because of the hypertextual nature of the Internet and also the variability of access sequences [8], [4], [7]. Vellanki et al [13] use a Lempel-Ziv (LZ) scheme that builds a directed tree structure based on temporal evaluation of disk accesses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%