1972
DOI: 10.2307/1978896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Pass-Fail System upon Achievement of College Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in contrast to those reported by others (Karlins, Kaplan, and Stuart, 1969;Quann, 1970;Meisenholder, 1971;Stallings and Smock, 1971;Gold, Reilly, Silberman, and Lehr, 1971;von Wittich, 1972) who examined performance in pass-fail courses and found achievement to be lower than in courses graded A-F. A major difference in the present study, however, was that student teaching is the culminating course in the major area rather than an elective or a required course outside the major area, as was the case in many of the previously mentioned studies. These results are in contrast to those reported by others (Karlins, Kaplan, and Stuart, 1969;Quann, 1970;Meisenholder, 1971;Stallings and Smock, 1971;Gold, Reilly, Silberman, and Lehr, 1971;von Wittich, 1972) who examined performance in pass-fail courses and found achievement to be lower than in courses graded A-F. A major difference in the present study, however, was that student teaching is the culminating course in the major area rather than an elective or a required course outside the major area, as was the case in many of the previously mentioned studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…These results are in contrast to those reported by others (Karlins, Kaplan, and Stuart, 1969;Quann, 1970;Meisenholder, 1971;Stallings and Smock, 1971;Gold, Reilly, Silberman, and Lehr, 1971;von Wittich, 1972) who examined performance in pass-fail courses and found achievement to be lower than in courses graded A-F. A major difference in the present study, however, was that student teaching is the culminating course in the major area rather than an elective or a required course outside the major area, as was the case in many of the previously mentioned studies. These results are in contrast to those reported by others (Karlins, Kaplan, and Stuart, 1969;Quann, 1970;Meisenholder, 1971;Stallings and Smock, 1971;Gold, Reilly, Silberman, and Lehr, 1971;von Wittich, 1972) who examined performance in pass-fail courses and found achievement to be lower than in courses graded A-F. A major difference in the present study, however, was that student teaching is the culminating course in the major area rather than an elective or a required course outside the major area, as was the case in many of the previously mentioned studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…This possibility is supported indirectly by research indicating that pass-fail grading has a negative effect on academic achievement (GDid et al, 1971;Von Wittich, 1972 ;Bain et al, 1973). Second , self-grading might increase learning by reducing anxiety and replacing "cramming" with more meaningful activity.…”
Section: J304j Tfaciiing Political Science I April I976mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many educators (Gold et al, 1971;Von Wittich, 1972;Kaplan and Stuart, 1969) expressed their concern with the grading alternatives, es pecially Pass/Fail variations, including passing with honors or with excellence (Wolansky and Oranu, 1978). The following pros and cons are given for the traditional letter grades and the Pass/Fail variation.…”
Section: Trends In Grading Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permits students to divert some energy away from grade-oriented studying to develop an intrinsic motivation to learn (Gold et al, 1971;Geisinger, 1979;Sgan, 1970;Von Wittich, 1972;Bain et al, 1971;"Reporting pupil progress," 1977).…”
Section: Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation