1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1971.tb01633.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Overtime Premium on Employment and Hours in U.S. Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence makes it very clear that these laws are effective in inducing employers to introduce shorter workweeks and to avoid long workdays (see imposing the 40-hour workweek in the US in the 1940s) [6], [7], [9]. Although it is not clear how much they do spread work (i.e.…”
Section: Overtime Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evidence makes it very clear that these laws are effective in inducing employers to introduce shorter workweeks and to avoid long workdays (see imposing the 40-hour workweek in the US in the 1940s) [6], [7], [9]. Although it is not clear how much they do spread work (i.e.…”
Section: Overtime Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But a rise in the fixed costs of labor increases the cost of an extra worker relative to that of an extra hour per worker. Because of that, imposing a per-worker tax causes employers to hire fewer workers and to extend the hours of existing workers [6], [7].…”
Section: Fire Employees or Cut Hours Worked?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, as with most firms, the price of "corporate culture" is embedded in the establishment of its philosophy of management. Ehrenberg (1971) shows that H is also a function of the wage. However, the firm in a labor market is assumed to be a price taker, with only quantity determined by demand.…”
Section: ( 5 )mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar difficulties have been faced in the pension literature and an alternative explanation borrowed from that literature is that while employees may be willing to accept wage reductions for more generous insurance packages, they would not be sympathetic to the idea of lowering their wages to offset higher administrative costs faced by the employing firm -and these costs are a major component of the total cost of insurance faced by particularly small employers. This would potentially drive a wedge 92 Leibowitz (1983), Ehrenberg (1971), Buchmueller and Lettau (1997), Olson (1992), Miller (1995), Ryan (1997) between the costs paid by the firm for health insurance and the wage reduction accepted in the labor market.…”
Section: Wages and Health Insurance Offeringmentioning
confidence: 99%