Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.3386/w17600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Macroeconomy on Health Insurance Coverage: Evidence from the Great Recession

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To measure the severity of the Great Recession, we focus on changes in unemployment. This is in line with the large literature measuring the relationship between macroeconomic fluctuations and health inputs and outcomes (Ruhm, 2000(Ruhm, , 2003(Ruhm, , 2004Cawley et al, 2015;Cawley and Simon, 2005), and besides, the previous literature suggests that unemployment is a better predictor of health outcomes and inputs than other measures of macroeconomic fluctuations (Cawley et al, 2015;Stuckler et al, 2009). To measure fluctuations in unemployment directly associated with the Great Recession, we follow Keegan et al (2013) and quantify the unemployment change in the recessionary period, 2007-2009.…”
Section: Measuring Recession Severitysupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To measure the severity of the Great Recession, we focus on changes in unemployment. This is in line with the large literature measuring the relationship between macroeconomic fluctuations and health inputs and outcomes (Ruhm, 2000(Ruhm, , 2003(Ruhm, , 2004Cawley et al, 2015;Cawley and Simon, 2005), and besides, the previous literature suggests that unemployment is a better predictor of health outcomes and inputs than other measures of macroeconomic fluctuations (Cawley et al, 2015;Stuckler et al, 2009). To measure fluctuations in unemployment directly associated with the Great Recession, we follow Keegan et al (2013) and quantify the unemployment change in the recessionary period, 2007-2009.…”
Section: Measuring Recession Severitysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Some previous studies include the location specific unemployment rate instead of constructing a specific measure of recession severity (Ruhm, 2000(Ruhm, , 2003(Ruhm, , 2004Cawley et al, 2015; (2) and (3) show real GDP per capita and unemployment rate in the last quarter before the beginning of the crisis (i.e., the peak quarter). Column (4) lists the duration of the crisis in quarters, while the last two columns show the percentage decline (absolute value) in real GDP and percentage point change in the unemployment rate from output peak-to-through, respectively.…”
Section: Measuring Recession Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recession did not have a uniform labor market effect: young adults experienced worse outcomes (e.g., higher levels of unemployment) than slightly older adults (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014). Moreover, access to private health insurance is tightly linked to employment over our study period (Cawley et al, 2015).…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we merge in demographic variables (sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, family income, and insurance coverage 11 ) from the Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey (ASEC) into the N-SSATS on state and year. Economic conditions may influence insurance coverage and need for SUD treatment (Cawley et al, 2015;Davalos et al, 2012). We proxy economic conditions with the seasonally adjusted annual state unemployment rate from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics database.…”
Section: State-level Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%