2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the interaction between increasing gestational age and obstetrical risk on birth outcomes: evidence of a varying optimal time of delivery

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the gestational age ranges that result in optimal birth outcomes for each of four risk-defined groups.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of singleton late thirdtrimester deliveries at a large urban teaching hospital between July 1995 and September 2003. Low-risk, advanced maternal age, hypertensive and diabetic patients were identified and grouped. Rates, by day of gestation at delivery, of cesarean delivery, major maternal perineal trauma, low 5-min APGAR score and NICU admission … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…AMOR-IPAT involves 2 components: the use of preventive labor induction to increase the likelihood that each woman gives birth within her optimal time of delivery, and the use of PGE 2 to ensure that adequate cervical ripening occurs before preventive labor induction. 11,15,16 With this new method of care, cesarean delivery rates were lower in the nulliparous, multiparous, and previous cesarean delivery subgroups. The overall association between AMOR-IPAT exposure and lower cesarean delivery rate remained statistically signifi cant after adjustment for multiple potential confounding covariates and for the potential impact of clustering inherent in our study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AMOR-IPAT involves 2 components: the use of preventive labor induction to increase the likelihood that each woman gives birth within her optimal time of delivery, and the use of PGE 2 to ensure that adequate cervical ripening occurs before preventive labor induction. 11,15,16 With this new method of care, cesarean delivery rates were lower in the nulliparous, multiparous, and previous cesarean delivery subgroups. The overall association between AMOR-IPAT exposure and lower cesarean delivery rate remained statistically signifi cant after adjustment for multiple potential confounding covariates and for the potential impact of clustering inherent in our study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because the 2 main indications for primary cesarean delivery-cephalopelvic disproportion and uteroplacental insuffi ciency-increase as a function of increasing gestational age during the term period of pregnancy, 12 and because the effect of increasing gestational age on cesarean delivery is exacerbated by the presence of specifi c obstetric risk factors for cephalopelvic disproportion and uteroplacental insuffi ciency, 13,14 the optimal time of delivery varies depending on each woman's individual risk profi le. 15 If spontaneous labor does not develop before the upper limit of each woman's optimal time of delivery, then AMOR-IPAT uses preventive induction to ensure that delivery occurs within the optimal time of delivery. The estimation of each woman's upper limit of the optimal time of delivery is directly related to the number and nature of her obstetric risk factors (see Supplemental Appendixes 1 and 2, available onlineonly at http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/ full/5/4/310/DC1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,4 However, more recent data finds that pregnancy complications, as well as risk of cesarean delivery, increase beyond 40 and 41 weeks of gestation. 5,6,7 One of the reasons for the differences seen between the older and more recent data may be due to improved pregnancy dating since the advent of real time ultrasound. 8 It has been demonstrated that improved pregnancy dating leads to fewer women being identified as having postterm pregnancies or requiring induction of labor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assessment is then used to estimate, for each pregnancy, an upper limit of the optimal time of delivery (UL-OTD) [24,[28][29][30][31]. The greater a pregnancy's composite risk of CD for either cephalo-pelvic disproportion (CPD) or utero-placental insufficiency (UPI), the earlier the pregnancy's estimated UL-OTD [31]. Pregnant women at term who do not develop spontaneous labour as they near their UL-OTD are offered induction of labour (IOL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%