2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-016-0548-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) pesticide policy on the management of leaf-cutting ants and termites in certified forests in Brazil

Abstract: Key message The recommendations accompanying pesticide derogations from the FSC are not efficient for the management of leaf-cutting ants and termites in certified forest plantations in Brazil compared with chemical control using insecticides. FSC recommendations ignore the biological and ecological features of pests and forest plantations in Brazil when they set global rules for forest certification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The monitoring and quantification of damage in forest areas attacked by insect pests using satellite images helps in decision-making processes, making it possible to reduce wood losses [19], environmental impacts, and the use of chemicals for pest control. This meets the requirements of forest certification agencies, such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) [25][26][27][28] and the Brazilian Forest Certification Program (CERFLOR) [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The monitoring and quantification of damage in forest areas attacked by insect pests using satellite images helps in decision-making processes, making it possible to reduce wood losses [19], environmental impacts, and the use of chemicals for pest control. This meets the requirements of forest certification agencies, such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) [25][26][27][28] and the Brazilian Forest Certification Program (CERFLOR) [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is especially interesting since the use of the main active ingredients for leaf-cutting ant control (sulfluramid and fipronil) is not recommended, being only possible due to the derogation approved by the Forest Stewardship Council, an important voluntary certification system of sustainable forest management (Zanuncio et al, 2016).…”
Section: Suscetibilidade De Operárias De Atta Sexdens Tratadas Com O mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deltamethrin, fipronil, fenitrothion, and sulfluramid, widely used for leaf-cutting ants and root termite control in Brazilian forestry, are now prohibited and in the FSC derogation process (except fenithrotion) (Zanuncio et al 2016). Fipronil and sulfluramid are considered highly hazardous pesticides because of their acute toxicity to mammals and birds.…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Philippe Garriguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deltamethrin and fenithrotion were also listed for this and because they are considered endocrine-disrupting chemicals and may exhibit acute toxicity to aquatic organisms (FSC 2015a; FSC 2015b). The FSC is thus prohibiting all registered and effective pesticides that, at present, represent the only viable technique for the control of leaf-cutting ants (Britto et al 2016;Zanuncio et al 2016). Poorly implemented control or total lack of control of leaf-cutting ants in Brazilian forest plantations can drastically affect the productivity and profitability of any forest plantation business, especially in the early years (Cantarelli et al 2008;Matrangolo et al 2010;Reis Filho et al 2011).…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Philippe Garriguesmentioning
confidence: 99%