2018
DOI: 10.15604/ejef.2018.06.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Corporate Capital Structure Dynamics in the Nordic Countries

Abstract: We gratefully acknowledge comments and suggestions given by several participants. The current paper is adapted and developed from the thesis written by Assel Uskumbayeva, a former student, School of Business, JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland. The standard disclaimer applies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is alleged that the structural form of poverty is deeply rooted in the socio-economic-political and cultural institutions of the country. It is further alleged that structural poverty is experienced over a long term period and often moves from one generation to another (Hundal et al 2018). A typical example of structural poverty in Zimbabwe is provided by most of the rural households and individuals with limited access to productive capital, productive land as well as other useful resources (Zimbabwe Ministry of Finance, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is alleged that the structural form of poverty is deeply rooted in the socio-economic-political and cultural institutions of the country. It is further alleged that structural poverty is experienced over a long term period and often moves from one generation to another (Hundal et al 2018). A typical example of structural poverty in Zimbabwe is provided by most of the rural households and individuals with limited access to productive capital, productive land as well as other useful resources (Zimbabwe Ministry of Finance, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trade-off theory explains that the burden of corporate tax does not fall on the debt servicing and as a result the firms can avail more interest tax shield by exposing less profit before tax to the corporate tax burden after paying higher level of finance costs to the debtholders by increasing relative share of debt in the firm financing (Kraus and Litzenberger 1976). However, the changing level of debt not only affect the firm value but also profitability and risk exposure of the firm, consequently it is possible that the benefits of debt (leverage) are outweighed by the falling profits, risk firm risk exposure, adverse investors reaction and personal income tax rate, among other things (Hundal, Sandstrom and Uskumbayeva 2018;Salim and Yadav 2012). Since the abovementioned effects of leverage are not uniform, therefore, it is utmost important to ascertain the impact of capital structure on the various measures of firm performance and firm risk exposure to make the financial planning of the firm seamless.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms have an optimal capital structure for long-term debt referred to as target debt to equity ratio. In order to finance growth and operations a firm can use both its own capital and borrowed capital (Hundal et al 2018). Optimal capital structure implies firms adjust from current debt-equity ratio to desired optimal level which minimizes costs (Ozkan, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%